Pam Bondi is a Jew controlled puppet.
And back when Texas sued the first Trump Administration after Congress reduced the Obamacare penalty to $0, the DOJ also declined to defend the law—instead joining Texas' side in court.
Why couldn't Pam Bondi's DOJ decide not to defend the National Firearms Act? She could—and that's why gun owners are so upset. Pam Bondi and the DOJ made the conscious decision to defend federal gun registration.
When Pam Bondi was selected as Attorney General, Gun Owners of America sounded the alarm. We warned that she was responsible for pushing gun control in Florida, and there was a chance that she would not take a hard stand for the Second Amendment.
As it stands, we were correct.
This isn't new either. Since Pam Bondi was made Attorney General, the Department of Justice has been fighting against GOA, preventing us from securing judgments in our cases against Biden administration policy, which would, in turn, keep gun owners safe from future infringements.
Instead, the Department of Justice has attempted to moot our cases, arguing that there's no basis for thinking that ATF will return to their past behavior.
nobody
npub14rw4...63wa
account deleted
The brief from Bondi's DOJ in our suit is indistinguishable from any brief filed by the Biden Department of Justice under Merrick Garland.
And the most egregious part? They don't have to do this.
In Washington, DC, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro has decided not to enforce DC's ban on "high-capacity magazines," arguing that "it is the United States's position that [DC's magazine ban] is unconstitutional."
The Jewish Controlled deep state remains pure evil.
In an ultimate betrayal of the 2nd Amendment, the Trump admin is DEFENDING the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934. @TheJusticeDept supports gun registration under the Necessary & Proper and Commerce Clauses, says the $0 NFA tax is still a "valid" tax.
Plan B stock to flow for BTC is NONSENSE.
The easiest fools to GRIFT are the jabbed morons of the WEST. 🤣
Developing nations have already garnered billions in climate financing. India, for example, receives around $30 billion annually in climate funding which is meant to help third-world countries reduce their reliance on oil and coal while developing "green tech." The dramatic inefficiency of green energy aside, it's unlikely that much of this financing is actually going into improving carbon emissions in India or anywhere else.
The biggest beneficiaries are NGOs and Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) working closely with the World Bank. These organizations collect the carbon funds and then redistribute that money according to their own guidelines. Carbon taxes also represent a fresh revenues source for various governments in the first-world, with some of this money being transferred to intermediaries in the name of "Climate Reparations."
In amerika Tall buildings magically collapse, but somehow in Hong Kong the stay standing.
Geez how strange.
Why are Europeans so afraid of Liberty?
We Must Resist The Rise Of A Global Censorship Regime
 French far left leader once again says the Great Replacement is real and good Jean-Luc Mélenchon: "Yes, Mr. Zemmour, there is a Great Replacement. Yes, Mr. Bayrou, there is a Great Replacement." However, Mélenchon says it is good because it allows people to "mix." Show more
This fatass psychopath knows NO history.
Like how the jabbed sheepbresisted the draconian Scamdemic nonsense.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Brussels bureaucrats must not be allowed to position themselves as the world’s speech police. For the freedom of all people, we must resist the rise of a global censorship regime so that what happened to Räsänen doesn’t become the new online norm.
Hong Kong buildi gs do not collapse like 9/11 buidings.
Damn the jabbed sheep are morons.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Like the jabbed sheep resisted the scamdemic.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
We Must Resist The Rise Of A Global Censorship Regime
Amerikans will not use public transportation because blacks make it unsafe.
In Amerika almost no Criminal Parasites are EVER held to account
FDA Chief: Fauci '100% Involved" In "Massive" COVID-19 Origins Cover-Up
I never want to hear an opinion from a jabbed bootlicking moron.
There is a feature of this report that simply breaks my heart. This is because I seriously doubt that anyone really believes in the truth of it. The claim is utterly unsustainable in light of any and all evidence. The Swedish experience is not discussed in any depth. It cannot because the Swedish experience disproves everything in this report.
I’ve been writing about this topic for five going on six years. My first piece was from January 2020, and it warned that if governments try to take on the microbial kingdom it will lose and utterly discredit themselves. I said this before we even knew of the thousand-fold differential in medically significant impact between the young and elderly and infirm. Even if the virus had been more serious, the result would have been the same.
Another reason that this report is demoralizing: tens and hundreds of thousands of actual experts the world over have debunked the pandemic response in countless numbers of papers, articles, and books. Have these protests made no difference at all? Are officials at all levels going to pretend forever as if these do not exist?
I don’t know the answer but this much I know: We cannot look to official statements of these sorts to codify truth. Instead, we can only count on them to be self-serving, a means of protecting the reputations and jobs of the very people who made such dreadful errors.
Just as no one should look to government to stop a fast-spreading and fast-mutating respiratory virus, we should not be looking to government commissions to admit error and pledge to do better next time. Just as the pandemic response discredited so many institutions, kicking off a new age of widespread distrust of everything and everyone, so too will more such reports entrench our culture of incredulity.
Given these conditions, the United States is better off with no commission at all. That said, it would be good for at least one legislative body to speak clearly and plainly about all that went wrong. My choice would be the U.S. Senate.
Maybe there is some chance of that with enough push from the grassroots. So long as there are no admissions of wrongdoing, there will be no healing from the anger and distrust that characterizes our times. This problem is not going away. As time has rolled on, the reality of what happened is ever more present in our lives
After all this time, one might suppose that the world would be awash in apologies along with pledges never to do anything like this again. One possible path to making this happen might be a COVID Commission. The United States has never formed one. Early on, there was talk about such a thing but it never came to fruition. Even now, there are no plans for such a thing.
This is for a reason. An honest report, one informed and written by independent researchers, would implicate both political parties, most universities, many government agencies, the Big Tech and pharmaceutical sectors, churches and schools that went along, in addition to a massive swath of incumbent elites in foundations.
Sadly, that is just not going to happen. I wish it were otherwise. Any official commission report written as a coverup would be dead on arrival. Not even the establishment is that dumb.
I would like to live in a society in which mistakes are admitted, brutality is repudiated, institutions adapt in light of failure, and leadership is mature enough to seek forgiveness for wrongdoing. We hope for a narrative of history that is self-correcting in real time: error followed by pledges to improve and sin by repentance and propitiation.
Sadly none of that is to be.
Somehow it came to be that the United Kingdom did put together an official commission.
