- Samson Mow says how it is! @Samson Mow 🤙⚡️

Everyday is a Good Morning! Goodnight! Stack Sats hold the fort!

Samson Mow has expressed reservations about Nostr’s current design, particularly concerning its decentralization and scalability. He has suggested that without significant improvements, Nostr may face challenges as it grows.  🧠 Samson Mow’s Concerns About Nostr Samson Mow has highlighted potential risks associated with Nostr’s reliance on centralized relays. He argues that if the protocol doesn’t evolve to ensure every client can act as a relay, it might face centralization issues similar to those observed with Lightning Service Providers (LSPs). Mow emphasizes the importance of thinking adversarially and preparing for future challenges to maintain Nostr’s integrity and resilience.  “Either Nostr evolves to have every client being a relay, or it will fail.” “Relays make Nostr centralized.” “You need to make every client a relay first. Relays are a risk to the protocol.” He also noted that the absence of clear incentives for individuals to run relays could hinder Nostr’s growth and decentralization efforts.  🔍 Alternative Approaches In discussions about improving Nostr’s architecture, Mow has suggested incorporating peer-to-peer components from projects like Keet and Holepunch. These technologies aim to enhance privacy and decentralization by enabling direct communication between clients without relying on central servers.  “Use the core peer-to-peer components from Keet / Holepunch.”  Additionally, Mow has advocated for a thorough analysis of Nostr’s decentralization to identify potential vulnerabilities. He supported Peter Todd’s grant application to conduct such an analysis, emphasizing the need for “red teaming” to ensure the protocol’s robustness.  “I strongly encourage the @OpenSats board to reconsider Peter’s grant request. Nostr needs red teaming.” 🧭 Conclusion Samson Mow’s critiques of Nostr reflect a commitment to ensuring that decentralized platforms maintain their integrity as they scale. By advocating for peer-to-peer solutions and rigorous evaluations, Mow aims to address potential centralization risks and promote a more resilient decentralized ecosystem.

- 🫡 cypherpunks, freedom, natural law, anarchy, individuality! We salute everyone of you!

- nice to hear @jack address this! Need cash app and better bitcoin use in Australia!!l

- Timechain not blockchain. Connecting the physical atoms and energy to the digital world. Proof of Work. Lots to unpack. Thanks. @jack mallers @Gigi

- Store of Value vs Currency. Is currency the right terminology we should be using? I’m no product fuck you!

I've never enjoyed social media until I met my people thanks Bitcoin and Nostr! Ugly truth over socially accepted norms any day. Protect the kids and keep the Tyrants on notice!

- be humble!!!

stack

- hot topic!

I’m appreciative of everyone working on freedom technology. You are the hero’s of our kids.

https://www.youtube.com/live/H0nTPrlQk2I?si=Bzym41X3_o0kemP0 - Self Custody

- Getting rich from Spam clogging nodes - Bitcoin University!

- btc Build the Change!