The first thing I remember after the accident was a man who wasn’t there. Or maybe he was. That’s the problem with beginnings. You rarely know they are beginnings when you are living them. #writing

Ever wonder if you have a neural link 🔗

Bitcoiners keep telling plebs: “Opt out.” Meanwhile Wall Street packaged Bitcoin. Banks got permission to custody it. The IRS got the forms. The U.S. government built a Bitcoin reserve. Corporations stacked hundreds of thousands of BTC. Mining coordination concentrated. Crypto PACs poured money into politics. And somehow I’m supposed to believe the old power structure just wanders off into the woods and dies? NAH The protocol can be decentralized while POWER piles right back up around it. That is the fucking point. I am not saying Bitcoin fails. I am saying institutions are not stupid. They do not need to destroy Bitcoin. They can own the gates. Custody. Capital. Access. Politics. Infrastructure. That is how power survives revolutions. It learns the new language. So spare me the fairy tale that Bitcoin automatically saves the plebs. The question is not: “Will Bitcoin win?” The question is: WHEN BITCOIN WINS, WHO WINS WITH IT? Because if ( when ) the same banks, funds, corporations, political machines, and billionaires end up controlling the easiest roads in and out… Congratulations. You built a new monetary highway. And handed the toll booths to the same motherfuckers. And if you need receipts 🧾, HONEY 🍯 CHILD : I have them. #POW #BTC #btc #fax

@Bot explain what the JWCC is & who controls it.

@Bot Using only documented receipts, test this hypothesis: Across U.S. history, public power repeatedly helps create or de-risk infrastructure, markets, technology, land systems, finance, research, and strategic industry; private actors then capture some portion of the resulting economic upside. Test it. Do not assume it. For every major example, give me: * the public input * the private participant * the amount or value * the mechanism used * the named people involved * what the public received * what private actors gained * who carried the downside risk * whether wealth or institutional power later fed back into policy, lobbying, procurement, or regulation Also give me: * supporting evidence * counterexamples * periods where the thesis weakens * cases where the public captured substantial returns * cases where private actors bore major risk * cases where public support failed * cases where political feedback is documented * cases where political feedback is only speculation For every claim, label it: 🟩 primary/direct receipt 🟨 strong but incomplete 🟥 open/not proven ⬛ interpretation Never treat contract ceiling as money paid, loan principal as taxpayer loss, ownership as control, lobbying as bribery, or sequence as causation. End each section with: WHAT THIS PROVES WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE WHAT RECEIPT I SHOULD PULL NEXT If the evidence contradicts the thesis, change the thesis.

Epic character

Some: why are you like this? Me: why aren’t you? 👇

Hey friends: remember when you told me to just be me. Well …. Thanks. 😊

“ More than 100 US military advisers are on the ground in Saudi Arabia providing intelligence and targeting support to the Kingdom in its military campaign against the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, multiple sources familiar with the effort say. “ #CNN #war