In my experience, if the stats can be juked, they will be juked.
https://medium.com/@roshanrevankar/juking-the-stats-5926eaf5464
radii
radii@orangepill.dev
npub14nka...5gj5
all ms office products suck
@preston has a cool interview with Caitlin Long here. It's always refreshing to hear Caitlin's level-headed and informed takes.
Check out the inside baseballs!

Spotify
BTC166: Bitcoin Custody For Institutions w/ Caitlin Long and Wes Knobel (Bitcoin Podcast)
We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network · Episode
When you have one clock, you always know what time it is.
When you have two clocks, you can never be sure.
This concludes our intro to distributed systems.
I am just dumb enough to do it!
corn is up


WWJD
Who was Jamie Dimon
We need more engineers.
More people who are literate in math.
thinking about changing my name to Gnocci Mane
Eye tracking for advertisement is not a new idea
https://image.nostr.build/c3d2a4f62f75d70734b53d43d4fa5a4824de4b625d5444643b089d8776346e06.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1080x1742&blurhash=%5EVMtaO-%3BaxIU%7EqM%7B%25MxufQRjM%7Bof-%3BD%25ay%25MRjofxuWBWBj%5BofWBf6fQofayM%7BofM%7Bayj%5BfQt7of%25Mt7WBWBRjayaxRjWBt7ofWBt7ayfQj%5BWBof&x=abbd542c5335aadc08d5bca6a011846952f80444282388ae06d2eb84b9f11772
If you were advertising a car, was it better to show a picture of a car, or of a pretty woman? If one was selling shirt collars, was it better to do so under the headline “Murder!” or the headline “Quality Shirt Collars”? To make a long story short (and to skip over the proto-pataphysical techniques by which Nixon established what we might call a “science of irrelevancy”), Nixon found that “irrelevant illustrations do attract more attention and hold interest longer than do relevant ones.” 8 Which is to say: systematically doing violence to sense raised revenue. This could be proven in his laboratory. Would it be wrong to say that we live, in many respects, in the world evolved from that finding?
Engage constructively with others.
Do not try to argue.
Try to understand and help.
Gently explain.
Sooner or Later

Spotify
Sooner Or Later
The Grass Roots · Move Along · Song · 1972
When is Matt Levine going to become a Bitcoin maxi. He is getting close.
"Bitcoin expresses the thesis that it would be good to have a valuable database entry without that, just something was valuable because people on the internet voluntarily agreed it was valuable, with no government or army or taxes or anything else. And it worked! That did happen. It has value due to a broad voluntary market consensus based almost entirely on itself. In some sense that consensus is fragile — if a thing is valuable only because people think that it is valuable, it could stop being valuable when they stop thinking that — but in another sense that is true of any social fact: The dollar is valuable, the King of England is the King of England, the US is a liberal democracy, etc., exactly as long as those facts command social consensus. Bitcoin got to what seems like a pretty robust consensus in 15 years. That’s just neat."
Save it for a Rainy Day

Spotify
Save It For A Rainy Day
Stephen Bishop · Careless · Song · 1976
What a Fool Believes....
We are all fools in one way or another, believing in the most outrageous shared delusions!
Lyrics in this track are on-point

Spotify
What a Fool Believes
The Doobie Brothers · Minute by Minute · Song · 1978