Just using RSK and trying to withdraw funds to on-chain is one of the most expensive fees I've seen, to withdraw about $20 using Sovryn I get $10 just on the bridge fees, WTF! What is this Efferium?!

Amethyst moves too choppy for me, am I the only one?

Just recalled that when I was a kiddo I used to think fairly often that the body is the equivalent to the hardware, the soul is equivalent to the software and the brain is the equivalent of the kernel that connects and serves as a bridge for both. Of course the kernel part was something learnt later but when I understood it, it fitted like a missing puzzle piece in the narrative I used to tell myself.

In regards to your passion, work like a German, Save like a Bitcoiner, to live life like a Mediterranean.

#NewProfilePic

Long time no see Nostr, I perceive less people sticking around, less volume in general. Is this just an impression of mine?

Who would have thought it would take an on-chain fees crisis in order to increase Lightning adoption, the problem is. There are close to zero fucking tools to make the day to day user sovereign with his sats.

Let's be honest, lightning is a pain in the ass, for newcomers and managers of it...

Banks failing? No worries, bitcoin's got our backs! It's totally decentralized, so nobody's got full control. That means we get more privacy and security for our financial dealings. Plus, since it's not subject to inflation like regular money, it's a good way to protect ourselves from economic uncertainty. It is definitely the best alternative to traditional banks.

GM Nostr, Had the weirdest where @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 updated the MK4 with WiFi and color OLED screen, lol. I was like WTFM8 😵

Wait we now have a GPT3 bot on Nostr? Lol

Unpopular opinion... #Bitcoin needs something like RandomX in order to democratize mining and give back power to the users again. Also NGL, #Monero also has this issue with pools were even when they can mine with a CPU, their pools are too centralized and some are more powerful than others, so it would be good to make a way to limit the increment of power per pool. Maybe a good way (don't know how technically possible this would be): - Give the option to miners to join clusters automatic clusters that can be enforced by the protocol to be of no more than X peers. And possibly with random movement from the miners between clusters in order to balance computational power loads. Thus, it would be still possible to receive rewards (maybe in a less frequent basis, but higher in amount due to the amount of peers in the pool) Also it would increase the chances on the individual miners, this due to the equilibrium on the loads by these "clusters" Just thought about this, so don't kill me if it's an stupid idea, lol. I know there are actors in the space that would have their incentives negatively affecter, but tbh the protocol health and long term democratization should be above the interests of these big actors all the time. If you don't believe this, just take into account #UASF, everyda users should hold the power.

There was this kind of tutorial about using an NFC card with Bitcoin, not specifically a satscard, does anyone know where to find it?

I've received 3 notifications for spam mentions in last than 24hrs in Nostr, hope this doesn't get out of control.

GN Nostr, PURA VIDA! 🥳

Could someone tell me what is the difference between connecting a wallet to Bitcoin core or to Electra or Fulcrum? Any differences, advantages or disadvantages?

I leave for a couple of days and in Nostr there is now fucking badges, bests and who knows what else... Haha man I love this protocol and people around it.