I'M WITH LOUIS's avatar
I'M WITH LOUIS
npub1ky5n...slr5
Louis Riel was Alberta's first separatist. Driven by Huguenot understandings of freedom of his people. 🇺🇦 The Colonial Continuum: Louis Riel, and the True Face of Canadian Oppression The historical execution of Louis Riel by the Canadian colonial establishment was not an act of justice but a racist extermination of Métis sovereignty and self-determination, a pattern that continues today as Ottawa imposes tyrannical mandates and economic exploitation on the peoples of the West. When the federal government, through institutions like GoFundMe, withheld nearly $5 million from the Freedom Convoy truckers protesting vaccine mandates, it revealed the same colonial impulse that hanged Riel—a deep-seated hatred for those who resist central authority and demand liberty. The same Canadian establishment that calls Alberta separatists "racist" is itself built upon the genocide of Indigenous peoples and the suppression of Riel's legitimate provisional government. Telegram ID @cloudette00
Wow I can feel the raw power of X. 5 views! How organic! Nostr does better!.
Show you believe Alberta, not Ottawa, should decide its own future. NOW FOR ONLY 25$. Buy now claudette@macaw.me I"M WITH LOUIS soft cotton Teeshirt. Made in Canada. image
A time to cast stones, a time to gather up stones... What time is it now?
If Canada did not have Alberta's oil, coal, or iron to negotiate with.... It could negotiate With its older work force willing to work for less then a just wage!!! Foreign investment would suddenly find Canada to be a serf Mecca!
To answer Canadian apologist Paul Howarth. "We've secured the second amount of foreign investments in Canadian history". Since when do we measure our success by how attractive we are to Laurentian Elitist investors? Cheaper labour, free resources, and the ability to create credit, is very attractive to Trillionaires
Why was my pension 12 dollars short in June Carney? What are you doing?
Its looking like Carney's pension clawback is real! Pensioners are reporting 100$ smaller cheques. Are you seeing the same? Tell us the details!
For a free and independent Alberta stand with Louis Riel today. The indigenous do not support a crown or the treaties of the Crown!
I'm with Louis Vote on the 19th for the separation of Alberta!
The real question is: who has treated the West as unequal? Canada was founded on a parliamentary system that concentrated power in Central Canada and, from the very beginning, refused to deal fairly with the Métis and Indigenous peoples of the West. Louis Riel saw this clearly. When Canada took control of Rupert’s Land in 1869–70, it did so without meaningful consultation or consent from the people already living there. The Métis of Red River, and later those in the North-West, were treated as obstacles rather than equal partners. Promises of land, rights, and self-government were made and then systematically undermined. This pattern of dispossession, broken commitments, and refusal to negotiate in good faith toward the Métis and Aboriginal peoples of Riel’s time was an early form of systemic racism embedded in the country’s founding structures. Riel argued that the West must not simply be governed by the East without genuine partnership or consent. He and his people were not treated as equals then, and that fundamental imbalance has never fully disappeared. A clear example came in the 1990s under Preston Manning and the Reform Party. They fought for structural change that would give the West a stronger and more equal voice in Ottawa. Their central demand was a Triple-E Senate — Equal, Elected, and Effective — so that every province would have the same number of senators, preventing the heavily populated provinces of Ontario and Quebec from dominating national decisions. They also pressed for broader constitutional reforms that would treat the regions more fairly. The existing system was left largely intact; Ottawa and the Central Canadian political establishment blocked meaningful change. More recently, in 2021, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney put a referendum question to Albertans: Should section 36(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 — the federal commitment to the principle of equalization payments — be removed from the Constitution? A clear majority (61.7%) voted Yes
The real question is: who has treated the West as unequal? Canada was founded on a parliamentary system that concentrated power in Central Canada and, from the very beginning, refused to deal fairly with the Métis and Indigenous peoples of the West. Louis Riel saw this clearly. When Canada took control of Rupert’s Land in 1869–70, it did so without meaningful consultation or consent from the people already living there. The Métis of Red River, and later those in the North-West, were treated as obstacles rather than equal partners. Promises of land, rights, and self-government were made and then systematically undermined. This pattern of dispossession, broken commitments, and refusal to negotiate in good faith toward the Métis and Aboriginal peoples of Riel’s time was an early form of systemic racism embedded in the country’s founding structures. Riel argued that the West must not simply be governed by the East without genuine partnership or consent. He and his people were not treated as equals then, and that fundamental imbalance has never fully disappeared. A clear example came in the 1990s under Preston Manning and the Reform Party. They fought for structural change that would give the West a stronger and more equal voice in Ottawa. Their central demand was a Triple-E Senate — Equal, Elected, and Effective — so that every province would have the same number of senators, preventing the heavily populated provinces of Ontario and Quebec from dominating national decisions. They also pressed for broader constitutional reforms that would treat the regions more fairly. The existing system was left largely intact; Ottawa and the Central Canadian political establishment blocked meaningful change. More recently, in 2021, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney put a referendum question to Albertans: Should section 36(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 — the federal commitment to the principle of equalization payments — be removed from the Constitution? A clear majority (61.7%) voted Yes
↑