"Bitcoin is a commodity, not a security."
You've heard it a hundred times.
It isn't written into a single U.S. law.
It's a regulator's position. And positions get reversed.
[2/7]
The current SEC Chair just made the argument for putting it in writing.
Paul Atkins, this week, on the CLARITY Act:
the statute is "the way to future-proof" the rules.
Without one, a future chair can walk them back with a memo.
[3/7]
The gap most people miss:
Agency guidance can be erased overnight.
New administration → new chair → new memo. Gone.
A statute can't. It takes an act of Congress to undo an act of Congress.
[4/7]
What the CLARITY Act would actually do for Bitcoin:
→ Class it a "digital commodity" — regulated like gold, not like a stock
→ Put it under the CFTC, not the SEC
→ Write that into law, not a memo
Only the third line makes the first two permanent.
[5/7]
Here's the catch. ⏳
The House passed it in July 2025.
A year later, the Senate still hasn't held a floor vote.
It needs 60 votes, it's stuck on an ethics fight, and the window before summer recess is nearly shut.
[6/7]
So until the Senate moves, nothing is settled.
Bitcoin's legal footing in America is on loan — sound only as long as the current regulators keep their seats.
[7/7]
One question splits Bitcoiners in two:
Do you want Bitcoin's status locked into federal law for good or is any bill that pulls Washington closer to Bitcoin a bad trade? 👇
I track every bill that touches Bitcoin: who's moving it, who's blocking it, and what actually changes if it passes.
Plain English. Before it hits your timeline.
The CLARITY vote is next.
Get it first 👇
The Bitcoin Act
Home | The Bitcoin Act
The Bitcoin Act is the first newsletter covering Bitcoin regulation, sovereignty, and legal developments — and rewards you with 21 sats every iss...
