I'm convinced the most powerful insight that one can have, in order to see the world in the most a dispassionate analytical lens possible, is to fundamentally come to understand where value-judgements enter our human arguments and understanding about the world. These things are what philosophers call normative arguments.
They are everywhere in your thinking.
Every argument you make about politics, economics and culture, has a normative argument hiding in there. No matter how "evidenced-based" or "objective" you think the position is.
When you learn to parse for that, you immediately see through a lot of the narrative-based reasoning traps that people fall into.
But still, no matter how analytical you are, you're going to have to show up with your own normative arguments, yourself. But being aware of them is critical to intellectual honesty.
Mike Brock
brockm@www.tbd.website
npub1hyqr...k7cp
@TBD. Some people have said I'm extremely reasonable person. Others strongly disagree! #bitcoin #tbd
The reality is this ... those people who think the decline of American-led rules-based order is going to usher in an era of peace, because you've convinced yourself that the military industrial complex is the chief antagonist in what would otherwise be a more peaceful world ... well, you may very well be about to feast on prodigious meal of rude awakenings.
I think the situation in Israel is going to be dramatically destabilizing to global security.
Kind of surprised: a lot of the people I thought my most recent WBD interview would really irk, have had pretty positive things to say about my arguments -- even if they didn't fully agree with me!
Who thinks I should return to Nostr?
Tried Threads. If I'm being honest with myself, I think it might be widely successful. But not necessarily because I think it's good. I think it's because they've clearly chosen to go all-in on algorithmic dopamine hits, and engagement farming to maximize addiction. Which, let's be honest, is bad for humanity and democracy.
A lot of armchair economists in bitcoin seem to think that there's such a thing as a true equilibrium price (my words) for things. Especially US Dollars and Bitcoin, and that that this price differs greatly from the marginal price, as a result of naïveté of participants in the market. This allows you to deduce the inevitability of future price trends with high certainty. Personally, I think this is nonsense. The marginal price is all that exists. Period.
I think this is true of *all* exchange markets, without exception.
Lot's of exciting things happening in Lagos! 

I have officially confirmed that Chicken Republic in Nigeria is way better than KFC. 

Hi Nigeria. 👋
Hey, it’s my first blog post in like 20 years. I feel like I have stuff to say. https://medium.com/@mike.brock/the-politics-of-virtue-versus-the-politics-of-consequence-dfbe6932ab83
