“Bitcoin lacks privacy. Transactions can be monitored and potentially controlled, which is why central banks aren’t looking to hold it.” - Ray Dalio
Interesting comments, particularly around the idea that Bitcoin’s transparency and traceability could make it unattractive as a reserve asset.
Bitcoin’s transparency is both a strength and an unresolved tension.
An open and auditable monetary network stands in contrast to today’s opaque financial system, raising legitimate debates around privacy, surveillance and state adoption.
Bitcoin was designed as a neutral monetary network operating outside the existing system of monetary management, political discretion and institutional gatekeeping. This is very different from saying institutions will never use it over time.
Judging its value around whether central banks approve overlooks why it exists in the first place.
Bitcoin was not created to optimise for institutional comfort, but to introduce the possibility of a new monetary system.
It's either too transparent for central banks or not transparent enough for law enforcement...
Full @CoinDesk article:


'Bitcoin transactions can be monitored’: Ray Dalio explains why central banks won’t touch BTC
Ray Dalio joins the privacy debate, saying Bitcoin’s full transparency makes it less likely to be adopted by central banks.













