Kayhan Sepanta 🪽's avatar
Kayhan Sepanta 🪽
_@kehiy.net
npub1h49w...9kay
Co-founder at dezh.tech, raxva.net 🏰🪽
I can't see a final single solution to spam. We need WoT (local and remote), Paid services, moderated relays and communities, Personal relays with management, local and remote AI moderation and finally network level rate limits. All of them will work together smoothly and keep us safe from spams. Just apply any of them you can in a correct and proper way and stop questioning people's solutions.
I was talking about some new cool stuff with @Awiteb and suddenly I realized most of our chat is weird Nostr specific stuff and jargon. If some normie see those, they think we are aliens. But it's not the case. We are just humans, living in future.
Most of platforms die because of two reasons. The first one is after a certain amount of time, they ran out of good ideas and they start adding weird features that pushes them off the road. When rhyme fails, all that’s left is nonsense. The second one is lyndeyLindy effect. A protocol is immune from both.
After the Nostr and removing author names from NIPs, it's the third time I agree with @fiatjaf. It's still not clear for me (even after reading this event and looking up previous workarounds) that how we exactly can achieve this without losing the interoperability and nuking the entire ecosystem that just works now. But I believe this repo is a bottleneck and it's bullshit. Free NIPs. The second thing is achieving this goal in any way makes me nervous about what if we ran out of kind numbers? How much stuff we expect Nostr to do for us? How many stuff we are going to map to the Nostr? This makes me believe in DMZ kinds even more! Also defining a way to post a Nostr spec as an event will be good as a solution, maybe just using traditional long form contents. View article →