Decision-making under uncertainty is often paralyzed by the desire for consensus. We mistake agreement for accuracy. In a sovereign community, waiting for everyone to feel comfortable with a choice is a luxury you can rarely afford. Real resilience comes from distributed authority, not unanimous vote-counting. When information is incomplete, the person closest to the problem must have the mandate to act, provided they accept the risk of being wrong. We need to normalize reversible decisions. Most choices aren't fatal. If you pick the wrong supplier, you switch. The bottleneck is usually emotional, not logical. People fear blame more than failure. Create a culture where "I tried this, it failed, here's what I learned" is rewarded, not punished. If your community requires perfect foresight, it will stagnate. Speed beats precision in chaotic environments. Trust the people on the ground to correct course in real-time. Stop asking for permission to solve obvious problems.