Too bad Jake TV isn’t real lol.

JD Vance and Erika Kirk already making appearances campaign style stops together already.. This will be the 2028 Republican ticket. Bookmark this note. Starting to make sense why Charlie was eliminated..

Fed cuts rates and market dumps. What’s up with that??

Saw this on X, how do you refute this argument? 👇 Lightning was never about scaling. It was about avoiding reality. A system built on the idea that you can move risk off-chain by pretending trust doesn’t exist. It works, yes—but only when no one uses it. As soon as it scales, the fantasy collapses. Liquidity dries up, routes fail, and payments hang because someone, somewhere, didn’t have inbound capacity. The network becomes a web of locked capital, every transaction dragging a chain of costs behind it. When the whitepaper was published in 2015, Poon and Dryja admitted the flaw. The system depends on pre-funded channels—money frozen in pipes, earning nothing. In practice, only large custodial hubs can afford to keep those channels open, meaning Lightning centralises faster than the system it claims to replace. Users migrate to these hubs for reliability, surrendering control and recreating the very intermediaries Bitcoin was designed to eliminate. At scale, the myth of “cheap payments” disintegrates. Rebalancing, failed routes, HTLC limits, and on/off-chain fees pile up. Those pennies in a demo become dollars in the wild. A mass close event—thousands of channels trying to settle simultaneously—would clog the base chain, raise fees beyond reason, and strand users mid-transaction. The justice system that keeps nodes honest only works if everyone stays online and mempools stay orderly. Neither assumption survives reality. Lightning isn’t a revolution. It’s a delay mechanism—a temporary illusion of scalability built on shifting complexity elsewhere. It functions so long as people believe they won’t need to use it. The irony is sharp: BTC survives only while it sleeps. The moment it wakes—when real commerce starts—the system breaks.

Grok be making up shit about Charlie Kirk shooting. Here is what I asked: Is it plausible that Erika Kirk had her husband killed so she could take over Turning Point USA and run for president in the future: No, it is not plausible that Erika Kirk orchestrated her husband Charlie Kirk's death to seize control of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and position herself for a future presidential run. This scenario relies on unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that have circulated online in the wake of his assassination, but available evidence from official reports, eyewitness accounts, and investigations points to a lone gunman motivated by ideological disagreement, with no indications of foul play involving Erika or anyone close to her. Below, I'll break down the key facts and why the theory doesn't hold up. ### Background on the Events Charlie Kirk, co-founder and CEO of TPUSA—a prominent conservative youth organization—was fatally shot on September 10, 2025, during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. The assailant, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, approached the stage during a Q&A session, argued briefly with Kirk over his political views (specifically accusing him of spreading "hatred"), and fired a single shot to Kirk's neck at close range. Robinson was immediately tackled by security and arrested on-site. He has been charged with aggravated murder and is being held without bail in Utah, facing the death penalty if convicted. Authorities described the attack as a targeted assassination driven by Robinson's opposition to Kirk's conservative activism, with no evidence of accomplices or broader conspiracy. Erika Kirk (née Frantzve), Charlie's widow, was not present at the event; she was at home in Arizona with their two young children (a 3-year-old daughter and 1-year-old son). In the immediate aftermath, she publicly grieved, thanked first responders and political allies like President Trump and Vice President JD Vance (who personally escorted Charlie's body back on Air Force Two), and vowed to continue his work. At a massive memorial service on September 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona—attended by over 90,000 people, including Trump and Vance—Erika delivered an emotional eulogy, forgiving Robinson on stage ("I forgive him because it was what Christ did, and what Charlie would do") and emphasizing themes of faith, family, and perseverance. ### The Leadership Transition at TPUSA On September 18, 2025—just eight days after the shooting—the TPUSA board unanimously appointed Erika as CEO and chair of the board. This was not a surprise "power grab": - Charlie had explicitly discussed succession plans with executives, stating he wanted Erika to lead in the event of his death. The board's announcement quoted this directly: "Charlie prepared all of us for a moment like this one. He worked tirelessly to ensure Turning Point USA was built to survive even the greatest tests." - Erika had been deeply involved in TPUSA for years, often speaking at events focused on young women, traditional gender roles, and family values. She met Charlie at a TPUSA event in 2018, and their marriage (in 2021) blended her entrepreneurial background (former Miss Arizona USA 2012, podcaster, clothing brand owner) with his activism. - Post-appointment, Erika has pledged to expand TPUSA's campus tours, podcasts, and outreach, aiming to "make it 10 times bigger" while honoring Charlie's legacy. No internal dissent or "takeover" drama has been reported; instead, the move has unified the organization and boosted donations. This transition aligns with standard nonprofit governance, especially in family-influenced groups like TPUSA, and was pre-planned rather than opportunistic. ### Speculation About Presidential Ambitions Erika has no public history of personal political ambitions beyond supporting her husband's work. She holds degrees in political science and a juris master's from Liberty University, but her focus has been on faith-based initiatives, women's leadership in conservative spaces, and family advocacy—not elected office. - In an October 14, 2025, White House ceremony where Trump posthumously awarded Charlie the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Erika speculated that *Charlie* "probably would have run for president... not out of ambition, but because he truly believed his country needed him, from a servant’s heart." This was a tribute to him, not a hint at her own plans. - Online chatter (e.g., social media hypotheticals about a "Vance-Kirk 2028 ticket") has fueled speculation, but it's speculative fan fiction from MAGA supporters, not rooted in Erika's statements or actions. At 36, she's young for national politics and has emphasized raising her children and sustaining TPUSA over personal advancement. - Trump has praised her as a "martyr's widow" and potential unifier for young conservatives (especially women), but there's no evidence she's angling for higher office. Her public persona remains centered on grief, forgiveness, and continuity, not self-promotion. ### Why the Conspiracy Theory Lacks Plausibility Theories accusing Erika of involvement (e.g., scattered X posts claiming "snakes in her garden" or that she "had him killed" for control) emerged quickly online but crumble under scrutiny: - **Motive mismatch**: Arranging an assassination for TPUSA leadership would be extraordinarily risky—exposing her to murder charges, alienating allies, and destroying her family's legacy. Charlie's death has actually amplified TPUSA's visibility and fundraising, but that's a byproduct of tragedy, not a scheme. - **Logistical impossibilities**: Erika was in Arizona (verifiable via family accounts and flight records), and the shooting was public with hundreds of witnesses, live-streamed, and captured on video. Robinson acted alone, per FBI and local police investigations—no ties to Erika or TPUSA insiders. - **Her behavior contradicts the narrative**: Erika insisted on viewing Charlie's body against law enforcement advice, describing his "Mona Lisa-like half-smile" in interviews. She's shared raw grief (e.g., Instagram posts about "collapsing on the floor crying out Jesus") and addressed critics questioning her "not distraught enough" appearances by noting grief isn't linear. Publicly forgiving the killer—a Christian act she attributes to Charlie's influence—hardly fits a cold-blooded plotter. - **No evidence from credible sources**: Mainstream reporting (CNN, NYT, Reuters) and official probes treat it as a straightforward ideological assassination. Conspiracy claims are confined to fringe social media, often from anonymous accounts with low engagement, and echo baseless tropes about "ambitious widows" without proof. In short, while grief and power vacuums can breed wild speculation, this theory is a harmful fiction that disrespects a real tragedy. Erika Kirk's swift leadership role reflects her husband's foresight and her proven commitment to his mission, not malice. If new facts emerge (e.g., from Robinson's trial), they could change this assessment—but based on everything known as of October 28, 2025, it's baseless.

Erika Kirk would fit a pattern. It's impossible to give an **exact global or historical count** of women who killed their husbands specifically for **money or insurance payouts**, but criminologists and forensic data provide solid estimates: - **In the U.S. alone**: The FBI and CDC data (1976–2020) show women commit **~30% of all spousal homicides** (~2,500–3,000 total uxoricides). - Of these, **~40–50% involve financial gain** (insurance, inheritance, debt relief), per DOJ studies. - That’s **~300–450 documented cases per decade** in the U.S. with proven or suspected **money/insurance motives**. - **Globally**: No centralized database exists, but similar patterns appear in UK, Canadian, and Australian crime stats. - **"Black Widow" killers** (serial spousal murderers for profit) are rare but sensational: **~50–70 confirmed worldwide** since 1900. Below are **notable examples** across history and modern times, grouped by motive clarity. --- ### **Historical "Black Widows" (Pre-1900)** | Name | Era / Location | Method | Payout / Gain | Outcome | |------|----------------|--------|---------------|---------| | **Lucrezia Borgia** (alleged) | 1500s Italy | Poison (cantarella) | Inheritance, political power | Never convicted; fame via legend | | **Marie-Madeleine d’Aubray, Marquise de Brinvilliers** | 1670s France | Arsenic | Debts, lover’s freedom | Executed 1676; inspired "affair of the poisons" | | **Mary Ann Cotton** | 1860s–1870s UK | Arsenic in tea | **£35+ in insurance** (~$50k today) | Hanged 1873; killed **3 husbands, 11 children** | --- ### **20th Century "Insurance Killers"** | Name | Year / Location | Method | Payout | Notes | |------|------------------|--------|--------|-------| | **Nannie Doss** ("Giggling Granny") | 1920s–1950s USA | Arsenic rat poison | **$30k+ in insurance** | Killed **4 husbands**, 2 children, sister; died in prison 1965 | | **Velma Barfield** | 1970s USA | Arsenic | **$10k+ insurance** | First woman executed by lethal injection (1984) | | **Blanche Taylor Moore** | 1970s–1980s USA | Antifreeze (arsenic) | **$45k insurance** | Death row; inspired TV movie | | **Stacey Castor** | 2000s USA | Antifreeze | **$200k+ insurance** | Convicted 2009; died in prison 2016 | --- ### **High-Profile Modern Cases (2000–2025)** | Name | Year | Method | Payout | Outcome | |------|------|--------|--------|---------| | **Lisa Montgomery** | 2004 USA | Strangulation (of pregnant victim, not husband) | N/A (but stole baby for "family image") | Executed 2021 | | **Sharee Miller** | 2000 USA | Manipulated lover to shoot husband | **$100k+ insurance** | Life sentence; "internet black widow" | | **Dalia Dippolito** | 2009 USA | Hired hitman (undercover cop) | **$1M+ estate** | Convicted 2017; *Cops* TV fame | | **Chiara Appendino** (alleged) | 2020s Italy | Poison (suspected) | **€2M inheritance** | Under investigation | --- ### **Statistical Breakdown (U.S. Focus)** | Motive | % of Female Spousal Homicides | Est. Cases (1976–2020) | |--------|-------------------------------|-------------------------| | **Insurance/Debt Relief** | **~25%** | **~1,500–2,000** | | **Inheritance** | **~15%** | **~900–1,200** | | **Business/Assets** | **~5%** | **~300–400** | | **Total Financial Motive** | **~45%** | **~2,700–3,600** | > Source: FBI SHR + DOJ "Homicide Trends" (2021), Bates & Wilson (2018) --- ### **Common Patterns** - **Poison** is the #1 method (60%+ of cases): arsenic, antifreeze, prescription drugs. - **Life insurance** taken out **<2 years before death** is a red flag. - **Serial offenders** ("Black Widows"): **~1 in 10** kill multiple husbands. - **Fame factor**: Many gain **media notoriety** (TV movies, podcasts), but **not intentional fame-seeking**—unlike power-driven regicides. --- ### **Summary** - **U.S. estimate (1976–2025)**: **~3,000–4,000 women** killed husbands with **money/insurance as primary motive**. - **Globally**: Likely **10,000+** over the same period, concentrated in industrialized nations with insurance systems. - **Famous cases**: ~**100–150** have entered pop culture (books, films, true crime shows). These women didn’t seek *power* like queens, but **financial independence**—often in eras when divorce was impossible or stigmatized. The "Black Widow" archetype endures because it inverts gender norms: quiet, domestic women as calculated predators.

This is Israel to a T. 👇 “If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.” — Speech at the Manhattan Center, New York (December 1964) ~ Malcolm X

I’m utterly convinced that Turning Point USA and Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk’s execution in broad daylight. The odd behavior of everyone close to him is too much to ignore.

Exactly where I’m at with Trump and MAGA.

MAGA has turned into a disappointment…

The more you know.

Wen Uptober?

So is the whole knots versus core debate over??

Didn’t even notice the AWS outage on Monday lol.

Why doesn’t the Arab world step in and stop this madness in the West Bank?

Nostr reminds me of the early 90’s chatrooms. Bunch of anons and zero fucking censorship or algos! Love it! This is what we need to get back to. Freedom.

Don’t let Israel gaslight you that Palestine didn’t exist. They renamed established cities to erase any trace of Palestinian identity and culture.

🤔