👀

We "the node runners" Run Knots 💧

GM

Interesting 🤔🧐

My DCA is unfazed, like the true pleb I am. 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

HOKAGEs Spam War Arc 2025

Savage

The final arc (Episode 99999999999)

Don't feel the need to say "I know"

So this is why we DCA 🥲

Reading be like

never go full Adam Back

FYI Bitcoin is "permissionless" It means "no one needs permission to abuse Bitcoin and fill the timechain with VC-funded junk"

highest-IQ prediction I believe

Core ™

WHAT IS SPAM

Bitcoin is 117k today? Okay.

KNOTS is safe, CORE v30 is not Running Knots is as safe as you want it to be. Just wait 6–12 months before upgrading, verify releases, and only run versions you agree with — if Luke pushes a commit you don’t like, you simply don’t upgrade. Use Knots purely as a watch-only node, sign all transactions with Sparrow + an air-gapped hardware wallet, and your keys never touch the node. Consensus changes need the economic majority, not a single maintainer, so Knots can’t force anything on you. With this setup, Core stops being a gatekeeper — the real risk of centralization is VC influence steering Core toward Ethereum-style rollups, not one maintainer shipping an optional release. The “1 maintainer” fear is a myth if you run Knots this way. Consensus cannot be changed by a maintainer — rules are enforced by the economic majority, not by commits. If Luke ships code you dislike, you simply don’t upgrade. By waiting 6–12 months, verifying signatures, and using your node only for verification while keys live on an air-gapped hardware wallet, the maintainer’s role is irrelevant to your security. A solo maintainer can’t steal your coins, can’t force a fork, and can’t override your sovereignty. With this setup, the number of maintainers is noise — your own upgrade discipline is the real security model. Plebs, can you help repost / boost this? #bitcoin #knots