View quoted note →

I enjoy rating the films and TV series I watch and keeping a daily record of them. As a cinephile, I like the idea of trying to keep my mind and memory sharper and make better use of my time in this way. However, I'm also completely fed up with the platforms I use -or, to put it more accurately, the ones I'm stuck using- Letterboxd and TV Time, which have utterly unrivalled designs, because although these cesspits may have the most suitable features and ergonomics for my purposes, the constant barrage of "wokeness" and "faggotry" I encounter at every turn completely ruins the whole experience. I'm sick and tired of those brainless, fucking sexual identity activists. If it weren't for the homos writing stupid, perverted comments about the male or female lead under every film -comments that contain absolutely no relevant analysis of the film or character development- such as "the film's biggest flaw is that the lead isn't bisexual" or "there aren't enough black and gay characters, aren't enough buttsex or scissoring, aren't enough girlpower" comments aren't highlighted, do these platforms really think they'll just cease to exist, for fuck's sake?! Don't these mentally castrated bastards even make up 1% of the world's population? What sort of servile dog-like submission is this to such a shitty and baseless narrative?! Whilst I am subjected to the disgusting comments of these perverted bastards -who have clearly missed out on any sense of humanity or natural norms- regarding every film and character that has been carefully adapted and properly acted, yet when I make the slightest criticism of multiculturalism in my reviews full of technical analysis, I'm immediately hit with one of the three strikes leading to a ban and the hassle of having my comments removed?! When will this platform's descent into such goysloppiness and degeneration ever end? I've literally been forced to limit my online presence as a man to Nostr. When these sons of bitches are crushed like insects as a result of the justified uprisings born from the sense of entrapment felt by men -who have been capable of building civilisations across the ages- they won't have the slightest right to complain. You paedophile bastards aren't even aware that you're turning the narratives of so-called marginalisation and oppression -which you've built on lies- into reality with your own hands! This is not a matter of freedom of expression; please do not come at me with that shallow argument. This is quite simply a systematic tactic of infiltration and corruption aimed at creating a society in the grip of madness and normalising an unstable, pathological, anti-civilised, fucked-up mindset by obscuring and distorting every reality.

The most fundamental ideological and economic conflict in the cryptocurrency world lies in the delicate balance between the promise of absolute digital scarcity and a network's long-term security budget. The rigid 21 million supply cap, which has become the holy grail for Bitcoin marximalists, harbors a serious design blind spot when the underlying game theory is examined in depth. Hoping that a network will remain secure forever by definitively freezing the protocol and rushing emission rewards toward zero relies on a blind faith that a magical hand will protect the system, rather than on economic realities. The assumption that transaction fees will be the sole element keeping miners on the network in the future leaves the very foundations of the system hanging by a thread. The greatest paradox created by this rigid scarcity model is hidden within Bitcoin's stagnant nature that has settled into popular culture -namely, the philosophy of holding without spending (HODL). If the community positions this asset solely as digital gold and locks it away in wallets, the transaction volume on the network will inevitably drop, and consequently, the total transaction fee budget allocated to miners will melt away. It is only a matter of time before a system with such a shrinking security budget becomes completely vulnerable to 51% attacks that threaten network security. Therefore, advocating for the absolute ossification of the protocol while starving the economic engine that keeps the system alive invites a self-consuming cycle. The Monero camp, on the other hand, has approached this structural dilemma with a far more realistic, pragmatic, and mathematical game theory, developing the tail emission model. The fixed reward of 0.6 XMR per block, provided permanently after the main supply schedule is completed, offers an uninterrupted source of economic motivation for miners to remain on the network, independent of time and transaction volume. Thanks to this continuous reward mechanism, network security is liberated from being intrinsically tied to how much transaction fees users are paying at that moment or whether they are hoarding their money under the mattress. This continuous issuance model, which might at first glance be perceived as inflationary, ensures that the proportional share of newly minted currency approaches zero each year due to the constant growth of the total supply; thus, it actually offers a disinflationary economic mathematics. Monero's design completely liberates the behaviors of spending and saving from the system's existential crisis, ensuring the survival of a peer-to-peer cash system. Ultimately, rather than abandoning the network's future to uncertainty for the sake of an artificial absolute scarcity, building sustainable security by smoothly infusing a lifeline into the system with every single block stands as the most tangible and flawless example of a rational digital economy. Kripto para dünyasının en temel ideolojik ve iktisadi çatışması, mutlak dijital kıtlık vaadi ile bir ağın uzun vadeli güvenlik bütçesi arasındaki hassas dengede saklıdır. Bitcoin marksimalistlerinin kutsal kâsesi hâline gelen 21 milyonluk katı arz sınırı, arkasındaki oyun teorisi derinlemesine incelendiğinde ciddi bir tasarım kör noktasını barındırmaktadır. Protokolü nihai bir şekilde dondurarak ve emisyon ödüllerini sıfıra doğru koşturarak bir ağın sonsuza kadar güvende kalacağını ummak, iktisadi gerçekliklerden ziyade, âdeta sihirli bir elin sistemi koruyacağına dair körü körüne bir inanca dayanmaktadır. Gelecekte madencilerin ağda kalmasını sağlayacak yegâne unsurun işlem ücretleri olacağı varsayımı, sistemin temellerini pamuk ipliğine bağlamaktadır. Bu katı kıtlık modelinin yarattığı en büyük paradoks, Bitcoin'in popüler kültüre yerleşen durağan yapısında, yani harcamadan saklama (HODL) felsefesinde gizlidir. Eğer topluluk bu varlığı yalnızca dijital bir altın olarak konumlandırıp cüzdanlarında kilitlerse, ağ üzerindeki işlem hacmi kaçınılmaz olarak düşecek ve dolayısıyla madencilere aktarılan toplam işlem ücreti bütçesi de eriyecektir. Güvenlik bütçesi böylesine daralan bir sistemin, ağ güvenliğini tehdit edecek %51 saldırılarına karşı tamamen savunmasız hâle gelmesi işten bile değildir. Dolayısıyla, sistemi yaşatacak iktisadi motoru susuz bırakırken protokolün mutlak kemikleşmesini savunmak, kendi kendini tüketen bir döngüye davetiye çıkarmaktadır. #Monero cephesi ise bu yapısal açmaza karşı çok daha gerçekçi, pragmatik ve matematiksel bir oyun teorisiyle yaklaşarak kuyruk emisyonu (tail emission) modelini geliştirmiştir. Ana arz programı tamamlandıktan sonra blok başına kalıcı olarak sağlanan 0,6 XMR'lık sabit ödül, madencilerin ağda kalması için zamandan ve işlem hacminden bağımsız, kesintisiz bir iktisadi motivasyon kaynağı sunar. Bu sürekli ödül mekanizması sayesinde ağın güvenliği, kullanıcıların o an ağda ne kadar işlem ücreti ödediğine ya da parayı yastık altında saklayıp saklamadığına göbekten bağımlı olmaktan kurtulur. İlk bakışta enflasyonist bir yapı gibi algılanabilecek bu sürekli üretim modeli, toplam arzın sürekli büyümesi sebebiyle yeni basılan paranın oransal payının her yıl sıfıra doğru yaklaşmasını sağlar, yani aslında dezenflasyonist bir iktisadi matematik sunar. Monero'nun tasarımı, bir eşler arası nakit sisteminin hayatta kalabilmesi için harcama ve tasarruf etme davranışlarını sistemin varoluşsal krizinden tamamen özgürleştirir. Sonuç olarak, yapay bir mutlak kıtlık uğruna ağın geleceğini belirsizliğe terk etmek yerine, her blokta sisteme pürüzsüz bir can suyu damlatarak sürdürülebilir güvenliği inşa etmek, rasyonel bir dijital ekonominin en somut ve kusursuz örneğidir.

Bitchcoiner bitches are utterly lame.

If I was part of the group responsible for pornography, coin-clipping, usury, communism, Bolshevik Revolution and The Red Terror, Holodomor, the opening of the Toledo Gate, slave trades, hijacking mass media, Kalergi Plan, Morgenthau Plan, open borders, regime change wars, pushing sexual degeneracy such as LGBTQABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP+++, pushing race mixing, pushing COVID and vaccine narratives, 24/7 anti-White narratives, quantitative easing, petrochemicals and the pharmaceutical, fertiliser and agricultural industries derived from them, stratospheric aerosol injections, well-poisonings, that drunkard of a pig called Winston Churchill being taken for a decent man, freemasonry, child sex trafficking, planned obsolescence, feminism, transgender surgeries, puberty blockers, fractional reserve banking, WWII ("Judea Declares War on Germany", March 24, 1933), parasitic welfare systems, antinatalism, mafia (Kosher Nostra), the pseudoscience known as "psychiatry", antidepressants and antipsychotics, contraceptive pills, nuclear armament, panopticon and internet surveillance, climate paranoia, the Talmud, the corruption of academia and of efforts to access knowledge, the constant obscuring of reality, Holocaust™ and the White guilt industry, the EU, Generation Zyklon, I'd want "hate speech" laws too.

View quoted note → #Monero is the only path to opt-out.

These are the best and second-best memes of all time.

TKD & TND

It really is that clear and simple. Those who are only focused on appearances miss the truth. Before it's too late, learn about #Monero and start using it.

View quoted note →

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha