Michael S Wildcard  ✨ πŸ˜Άβ€πŸŒ«οΈπŸ—½βš‘'s avatar
Michael S Wildcard ✨ πŸ˜Άβ€πŸŒ«οΈπŸ—½βš‘
MichaelS@bitcoinveterans.org
npub168u2...68qx
Location: Middle Tennessee, USA Homesteader, entrepreneur and all around goofball Talks about: Guns, knives, pipes/tobacco, livestock, Liberty, Freedom, Free markets, Austrian Economics, AMSOIL, Infinite Banking, Bitcoin, Shitcoin, Lightning payments, building meaningful social relationships, business, entrepreneurship, homesteading, permaculture, agriculture, generational wealth, personal finance... Member of npub1qktts9naunvjdwsktq5xjdhwh539xt4x0mqj4yxq0q9dvm03ljvs6sms0r get on the mission #GrowNostr #AMSOIL #AMSOILLubeDirect #LubeDirect #InfiniteBanking #FinancialTailwind #plebsrustica #ChestnutRidgeTN #middleTN #Tennessee ⚑⚑ zapper Nostring since 4/20/23
The Podcast, hosted by CEO Bryan Dawson, as he sits down with filmmaker Chad O. Jackson to discuss his groundbreaking docuseries, The MLK Project, premiering October 3rd. In this candid conversation, Jackson fearlessly challenges the widely accepted narrative surrounding Martin Luther King Jr., exposing a side of the civil rights icon that has been obscured by decades of public education and media portrayal. With meticulous research and historical receipts, Jackson unveils King’s ties to Marxist ideologies, his role in expanding federal power, and the subversive impact of the Civil Rights Movement on both black communities and American society.
Maybe a good day to watch some truth? https://www.historev.com/ Isn't this the best marxist holiday that they have foisted upon us? The MLK Project is a documentary series directed by Chad O. Jackson, released on October 3, 2025, that challenges mainstream narratives of the civil rights movement. The series examines alleged communist influences on the movement, questions claims of systemic racism, and explores the historical context of post–Civil War segregation. It features scholars such as Carol Swain and Virgil Walker.
The debate over whether the United States should be described as a democracy or a constitutional republic often centers on the difference between popular rule and the legal safeguards that limit that rule. Those who emphasize β€œdemocracy” point to the U.S. system’s reliance on elections, citizen participation, and majority decision-making as evidence that the government reflects the will of the people. From this perspective, the U.S. functions as a democracy because voters regularly influence laws, policies, and leadership through ballots, civic engagement, and referenda in some states. Advocates for this view argue that emphasizing democracy underscores the power of ordinary citizens in shaping government action and holding officials accountable. On the other hand, supporters of the β€œconstitutional republic” label stress that the U.S. Constitution sets clear limits on what the majority can decide, protecting individual rights and smaller political entities from being overridden. In this view, while elections and public participation matter, they operate within a framework of checks and balances, judicial review, and a codified set of fundamental rights that cannot easily be altered by majority vote. Proponents argue that calling the U.S. a constitutional republic highlights the balance between popular sovereignty and the rule of law, ensuring that governance remains orderly, fair, and resistant to fleeting majorities. The debate ultimately reflects differing emphases on citizen influence versus institutional safeguards, making both terms relevant but contextually distinct.
↑