SovereigntyQuest's avatar
SovereigntyQuest
npub16afk...h4dp
Vladimir Alexandrovich Lefebvre(1936-2020)- Reflexive Theory Sergey P. Rastorguev- Information War Igor Panarin (1958- ) Don't trust, VERIFY 👾
This quote is from Johnny Ng, the HK Legislative Council member and CPCC member. He posted it to his X a/c. As is so often the case it seems "news" about HK and Bitcoin gets out over it's skis and flies around in the grifter/influencer/breaking news crowd. Don't trust, VERIFY "Former U.S. President Trump recently gave a speech at the U.S. Bitcoin Summit, sharing his views on Bitcoin. Bitcoin and Web3 have already gained the attention and development of countries around the world, and Hong Kong is also actively becoming a hub to promote technological and financial innovation. I have the following perspectives: 1. Bitcoin and Web3 are important milestones in the development of globalization. Blockchain technology has solved many innovations in finance and real-world applications, and we should encourage global development together, as this is in line with the application development of blockchain technology. 2. Regarding Bitcoin becoming an official financial reserve for a country or region, I think this is worth considering. The global acceptance of Bitcoin is constantly increasing, and Bitcoin is seen by the public as "digital gold" in the context of its technology, so in the future, it is indeed possible to research and consider including Bitcoin in strategic financial reserves, as long as it is compliant. 3. Hong Kong must accelerate the development of the Web3 ecosystem. Now Hong Kong is at the forefront of the region in terms of compliant regulation and industry development, and I believe the HKSAR government will open the market in a gradual, progressive and responsible manner. At the same time, Web3 represents technological and application innovation, so Hong Kong should further build an ecosystem to attract globally competitive talent and capital, public chains and exchanges, enterprises and projects, etc. to the city, in order to foster the technological development of the industry. I will discuss the feasibility and opportunities of including Bitcoin in financial reserves with different stakeholders in Hong Kong, and will report the situation to everyone in a timely manner."
"I still believe that, in the long run, the aggregate of the decisions of individual businessmen, exercising individual judgment in a free economy, even if often mistaken, is likely to do less harm than the centralized decisions of a Government; and certainly the harm is likely to be counteracted faster. As I said earlier in this debate, our economic medicine may be painful but it is fast and powerful because it can act freely." Sir John James Cowperthwaite, Financial Secretary of Hong Kong 1961-1971
For those that like to read....... An interesting paper exploring the nuances of what are called "sanctions" and what examples from history might teach us. I hope this extract from the conclusion isn't a spoiler! 😬 "By way of conclusion, it may serve to explain what motivated this project, and what is yet to be done. This Article’s research into the Chinese boycotts began with the recognition that most of the literature on “sanctions” in international law and politics is focused on programs by Western countries and major international organizations. This focus is not unwarranted, given the size and scope of U.S. sanctions in particular, and the millions of people who are subject to them. Nevertheless, the hypothesis was that we miss important aspects of the story by focusing only on the Western cases, to the exclusion of acts of force and resistance by smaller states or other actors. This investigation of the Chinese boycotts, it is submitted, validates this hypothesis by showing the importance of that story to the development of international law and to broadening the horizons for descriptive and normative inquiry." The paper can be accessed here..... https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4531489
The recent Bitcoin "strategic reserve" seems to have gathered a momentum. While I do foresee this being something we will see state players doing in time, I wonder if the framing of the argument, especially in the USA, has been co-opted and what we are seeing is more to do with politics and votes in the coming US election. The demographic who are100% convinced without nuance or, it seems, awareness of the subtleties of state propaganda, that "China and Russia are dumping US Treasurys and hoovering up gold to undermine dollar dominance.", perhaps are a large enough group to warrant courting for their support.