Trump's coin issuance is a signal to the world that anyone that wants to can create a new coin. no longer any risk of prosecution There is likely to be enormous supply coming on stream and that is not going to be good for price of any of them!

Throughout history, the ability to own and control property has been intimately linked with literacy. In medieval times, when most people couldn't read or write, they were effectively excluded from property ownership - unable to read contracts or verify their rights. They had to rely on others to interpret and validate their property claims, creating a fundamental power imbalance where literacy itself became a tool of control. The spread of literacy democratized property ownership by enabling people to directly understand and engage with their property rights without intermediaries. Today, we face a similar junction with digital property. Just as traditional literacy enables understanding of written contracts, cryptographic literacy enables true ownership in digital space. Without this new literacy, people remain dependent on platforms and institutions to mediate their digital rights, just as illiterate people once depended on others to interpret their contracts. The path to true digital property rights requires not just technological tools but widespread understanding of how to use them.

The addiction machine isn't driven by malice but by personal profit. In the attention economy, user attention is the product being sold to advertisers. More user attention means more advertising revenue. More advertising revenue means higher stock prices. Higher stock prices mean larger bonuses for CEOs and executives, who can make tens or hundreds of millions of dollars annually through stock options and performance incentives. This creates a fundamental misalignment between executive enrichment and user wellbeing. Features that might help users maintain healthy boundaries or reduce compulsive usage directly conflict with executive compensation packages. The platforms are economically incentivized to make their services as addictive as possible because the personal wealth of those in charge depends on it. While shareholders may benefit, the primary driver is the enrichment of a small group of executives who make the decisions about how addictive these platforms become.

Reform are leading the UK polls

gm nostr

gm nostr

GM Nostr

Los pequeños triunfos generan confianza y dinamismo

Consider a podcast creator using Fanfares. They record an interview that's too controversial for traditional platforms. Instead of self-censoring or risking demonetization, they: 1. Release part one through traditional channels 2. Build audience through existing platforms 3. Encrypt premium episodes through Fanfares 3. Set their own price in bitcoin 4. Let listeners pay directly through Lightning 5. Distribute access keys through private Nostr messages When using FanFares, no platform can stop them. No advertiser can pressure them. No payment processor can freeze their funds. This is sovereignty in practice, not just theory. But they also don't have to abandon the reach of traditional distribution.

GM Nostr

The convenience of smart phones is so compelling, the social pressure so strong, that most users accepted these risks without much thought. Perhaps most significantly, the mobile transformation has changed our concept of privacy. The idea of a private life, separate from digital observation, has begun to seem quaint, even impossible. How can you maintain privacy when you carry a tracking device everywhere you go? When your every movement, interaction, and transaction is logged and analyzed? This isn't just a technological shift—it was a cultural revolution. The smartphone has become an external brain, a social mediator, a lifestyle manager. We have gained incredible capabilities, but became dependent on systems we don't control, can't fully understand, and can't easily leave. The question now isn't whether to participate in this mobile-first world—that decision has largely been made for us. The question is whether we can create alternative systems that provide the convenience of mobile technology without the surveillance and control. The answer lies not in rejecting mobile technology, but in reimagining how it could work with different incentives and different power structures.

The business model behind algorithmic control is deceptively simple: harvest attention, convert it to data, use that data to predict and influence behavior, monetize the results through advertising and behavioral modification. But this simple model has profound implications. Traditional market economics assumed rational actors making informed decisions. Today's market is shaped by algorithms designed to bypass rational thought and trigger emotional responses. The invisible hand of the market has been replaced by the invisible strings of algorithmic manipulation.

gm nostr

don't leverage your bitcoin @Michael Saylor

gm nostr

GM Nostr

The Nostr protocol is remarkably resistant to spam and abuse. While anyone can create a Nostr identity, building reputation takes time and effort. Bad actors can be filtered out by users and clients without compromising the network's openness. The system creates natural incentives for good behavior without requiring central authority. But perhaps most importantly, Nostr provides a foundation for new types of social organization. When identity is truly owned by individuals rather than platforms, new forms of collaboration and coordination become possible. Communities can form and evolve without being bound to specific platforms or controlled by corporate interests. The challenges are significant. The protocol is young. The tools are still developing. The user experience needs improvement. But these are implementation challenges, not fundamental limitations. The core innovation—self-sovereign digital identity—is sound.

GM Nostr