Bitcoin maxis love to invoke Laszlo's $700M pizza purchase as proof you should never spend bitcoin. But they're getting opportunity cost completely backward.
The common argument goes like this: "Don't spend bitcoin because it'll be worth $1M someday. Spend your dollars instead—they lose value anyway." Sounds plausible. It's also wrong.
A $100 expense costs you $100 regardless of whether you pay in BTC or cash. The opportunity cost is the spending itself, not the medium.
Here's what most people miss: You can spend bitcoin and immediately replace it with the cash you didn't spend. The "spend and replace" method achieves the same end result as just spending cash—your BTC stack stays intact.
The real question isn't which money to spend. It's whether the expense is necessary or makes your life meaningfully better. Everything else is waste that delays financial independence.
For FIRE practitioners, every expense cuts two ways at once: money spent could have been saved, and your FIRE number increases by 25x that expense under the 4% rule.
Stop obsessing over which currency to use. Start questioning whether you should be spending at all.
---

💳 Spending Bitcoin
FIRE BTC Issue #6 - The opportunity cost fallacy of spending bitcoin vs dollars















