The "Bitcoin has no intrinsic value" critique shows up like clockwork when the price dips. Bitcoin critics proclaim it with confidence, as if stating it settles the debate.
Here's the problem: nothing has intrinsic value. The entire concept is incoherent.
Financial analysts define intrinsic value as an "objective" measure of what an asset is worth. Then in the next breath, they admit there's "no universal standard" for calculating it. Even their preferred method—discounted cash flow analysis—produces values that differ from market prices, which proves the calculation isn't inherent to the asset itself.
What people call "intrinsic value" is really just utility. And utility is entirely subjective.
A glass of water is priceless to someone dying of thirst in the desert, virtually worthless to someone at home with clean water on tap. The water's physical properties didn't change. Only the context and individual need changed. Same with a painting that fetches millions at auction—not because of the cost of canvas and paint, but because people perceive it as beautiful, historically significant, or a status symbol.
Austrian economist Carl Menger put it plainly: "Value is a judgment economizing men make about the importance of the goods at their disposal for the maintenance of their lives and well-being. Hence value does not exist outside the consciousness of men."
All value is subjective. It exists in our heads, not in the physical properties of assets.
Gold bugs criticize Bitcoin's lack of intrinsic value while ignoring that gold's market value exceeds its industrial use value many times over. Real estate investors point to housing utility while ignoring that identical buildings sell for wildly different prices based on location. Stock investors run DCF models that produce values different from market prices, then claim those models reveal something inherent.
Bitcoin provides clear utility to millions of people: an absolutely fixed supply that can't be debased by governments or banks, digital portability with self-clearing capabilities, and sovereign control of wealth without counterparty risk. The market values Bitcoin at multiple trillions today precisely because people recognize that utility.
Critics who dismiss Bitcoin for lacking intrinsic value are arguing against a concept that doesn't exist. All financial assets—stocks, gold, real estate, Bitcoin—are speculative bets on future value based on perceived utility. Bitcoin is no different, except its utility is becoming clearer to more people every day.

🙃 The Intrinsic Value Myth
FIRE BTC Issue #22 - A common critique of bitcoin, refuted