"A minority of nodes credibly threatened to reject non-SegWit blocks, helping turn latent support for SegWit into an activated consensus."

Be cool to people who change their mind about BIP110. However, if years down the line, they lie about where they stood or how it all went down, like Corallo with BIP148, then they should be unequivocally disregarded and can go fuck themselves.

Is Frank Wright a Bitcoiner or what?

GM, still not going back to twitter

Stablecoins on Bitcoin is an attack.

#Tolkienstr View quoted note →

Me, when you tryna tell me I need to go back to Twitter View quoted note →

I won’t go back to twitter because I won’t have that nightmare slop on my astral plane. I already put in time countering fiat retards there 2021-2023, that was enough.

This is how I Nostr

“Having men work with women is like having a grizzly bear work with salmon dipped in honey.” RIP Patrice

GM

Letting people be is underrated

If you’re going to call Confederates traitors, then you need to call Washington a traitor too.

David Bailey in prison before 2028 View quoted note →

Such unbelievable hypocrites

Deep fucking value territory. But wouldn’t be surprised to see 30s this year because of how few actual adopters there are and the games that fiat terrorists play. They’re trained at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton to blow themselves up, what else would you expect?

A government's size is proportional to the amount of capital that it can steal.

Crossing from Wall St momentum traders to real adoption might take a cartel member failing or breaking ranks. A significant enough central bank going down and the other cartel members are unable or unwilling to save it. Internal conflict between a central bank and its commercial banks over a CBDC, which causes one or more commercial banks to defend itself from disintermediation and obsolescence by adopting Bitcoin.

Tough call between Alexander Hamilton and Churchill. Hard to say which caused more damage. Hamilton is more abstract, Churchill is more explicit. View quoted note →