I won’t got back to Twitter because it’s not a fair fight. I can’t 1v1 CEOs, billionaires, suits etc because they can just block. On Nostr, there’s no retreat. Mute can’t save you. Step into the octagon and let’s talk.

Anyone know the situation with Aqua wallet LN? Have a tiny amount of funds stuck there. Haven’t seen any updates.

Evergreen View quoted note →

Vaccinologists assume the safety of childhood vaccines just like some people assume the randomness of RNGs, depositors assume the effectiveness of FDIC… https://fountain.fm/episode/kpOKoVIDcZoZ4f5QtRqt More great rips in here by Aaron Siri about childhood vaccines, if you haven’t heard him before. Cc @Kudzai Kutukwa

I will follow a minority fork that rejects demurrage and/or tail emissions. I don’t care how much hash you have. How many billionaires and institutions you have. How many coins you have. How many influencers you have. How much you gaslight me. If I’m outnumbered 10,000 to 1. Maybe you think this sounds obvious and inconsequential to say right now. But give it 5, 10, 20 years. Marxism is ubiquitous, insidious, and too tempting for most to reject.

“You can’t stop stablecoins on Bitcoin.” Obviously, digital assets (on Bitcoin) are retarded. It’s not that Bitcoin will price them out because they’re retarded and will fail. No, the FIC most likely knows that tokenization is retarded, but all they need to do is pervert mining incentives enough, such that they gain further control of mining. Their end goals are demurrage and tail emissions.

These will make for good short opportunities in a couple years. View quoted note →

View quoted note →

A huge regret is not knowing enough at the time to run a URSF for Taproot. It would’ve failed because devs want novelty and to feel like they’re “doing something”, influencers want in with the devs, and plebs trust the influencers, but at least my conscience would be clean. Even today, 5 years later, there’s still no market demand or any on the horizon for taproot’s features, other than spam. If you supported it, I hope you own up to your mistake.

DATUM fixes this.

A couple years from now, as blockspace is increasingly used for stablecoins, there will be another UASF to curtail them, but it will fail. Miners will reject it. Why would they kill their fee revenue? Strategy Bank and all the same influencers will continue to gaslight you. They’ll tell you that stabelcoins on Bitcoin are good because it pays the miners, that they’re valid transactions anyway (thanks Taproot and Lightning Labs), and if you try to stop them then you’re censoring…after they read the ad for their Bitcoin yield product. They’ll tell you it’s not a problem, and even if it was, it doesn’t matter because eventually, Bitcoin tx fees will price out the stablecoin fees. Then there will be another policy or implementation change that further decreases Bitcoin’s moneyness. And another. Then another failed UASF. More incremental changes. Until one day, demurrage or tail emissions are proposed, and there’s nobody left to stop it because all the people who cared about Bitcoin as money have been gaslit and ostracized out of the project. The people want slop, yield, scams, and trusted third parties, so that’s what they’ll get.

From 4 years ago, back when Shinobi maybe still had some soul left. Imagine stablecoins on Bitcoin grow, but then node runners decide to soft fork them out. Which side do you think the miners will take? Sweet dreams.

Bitcoin Magazine

Examining The Incentives Of Stablecoins On Bitcoin

The incentive impacts that stablecoins have on Ethereum could equally arise in Bitcoin if enough value is brought into the equation.

Federal Reserve stablecoins are valid transactions bro. What are you gonna do about it?

The proportion of marxist subversionists keeps increasing as they drive and drown out the sane. Same thing happened to Reddit. Only thing is, Bitcoin is the last bastion, there’s nowhere else to go. Have fun playing with your Bitcoin stablecoins and tokenized securities.