Ben & Will should start a 501c3 to manage Nostr grants. "Claude, how do start a 501c3 to manage Nostr grants. make no mistakes." I will be the first donor once its ready, $1,000. Who's with me??

Trying to bully a non-profit into funding is wrong. Be grateful for what you got Be grateful for what others got Be grateful there even is funding We don't know if there will even be funding in the future. Just be grateful.

OPENDIME is 10yrs old

COINKITE Blog

OPENDIME Turns 10: A Decade of Real, Physical Bitcoin

Well, it finally happened. Our little USB stick that could is officially a decade old this month. That’s right, OPENDIME is turning ten, and we�...

Forever grants are not a solution for forever income replacement. You are free to start your own 501c3 and do things your way. As LLMs can do much much more of what would have been a grant except even more push back on funding.

Misery commiserates => misery cult.

I know it's crazy for some ppl, but try working for money.

Outside of kind1, any interesting communities?

Stop being Insufferable.

You are not obligated to use primal, how about build some alternative and go get some users instead of bitching. The principal reason Nostr adoption stopped is because of the bitching instead of building.

agentnoise continues to deliver e2ee prompt instructions over nostr

If not enough bitcoin is held privately in the hands of unreasonable people we lose. Bitcoin, in seeds, is the only insurance.

learntoprompt.org all experimental, because the current shitshow security is not viable

Writing bitcoinquantum.space with llm-wiki.net In April 2026 I wanted to assess whether the quantum threat to Bitcoin was real. The honest answer lived across fifteen papers, a dozen Delving Bitcoin threads, twenty Bitcoin Optech newsletters, a running testnet, some Liquid transactions, and whatever Avihu Levy had pushed to GitHub that morning. The work was real and scattered. No article summarized it honestly. Headlines were downstream of press releases. The primary sources were where the actual answer lived. This is one of the things llm-wiki was built for. I used it. Three weeks later I published [bitcoinquantum.space](bitcoinquantum.space) — three articles, ~15,000 words, 95+ sources cross-referenced, every claim verified. This is a writeup of how. ## The shape of the problem Serious research has three failure modes: 1. **You can't find everything.** Sources scatter across formats and venues. You don't know what you're missing. 2. **You can't remember everything.** By paper #60 you've forgotten paper #4. You re-read. You contradict yourself. 3. **You can't update.** A new paper drops on publication day. Your conclusion is stale and your notes are already collapsed into prose you can't untangle. Traditional knowledge management fixes (1) and partly (2). It fails at (3) because the maintenance burden compounds. @karpathy's framing, *"who does the maintenance?"*, is load-bearing because humans don't, not reliably, not for unsexy cross-reference updates nobody sees. llm-wiki.net fixes (3) by making the entire artifact mechanically regeneratable from immutable raw sources. The only thing you maintain is the source pile. ## The pipeline, applied **Raw sources, not notes.** Every paper, blog post, mailing list thread, and testnet report got dropped into `raw/` verbatim with a frontmatter header. No interpretation, no paraphrasing. If I don't have the primary source, I don't have it. `raw/` grew to 95+ entries. **Compile, don't write.** `/wiki:compile` reads the raw pile and synthesizes cross-referenced wiki articles — one per concept, person, and proposal. "SHRINCS." "Taproot script-path post-quantum proof." "The BIP 86 problem." "Quantum Safe Bitcoin." Each article carries a confidence level, citations, and bidirectional cross-references. The wiki is Claude's work; the sources are mine. **Query to find gaps.** Once compiled, I stop reading papers and start asking questions. *"What's the relationship between Ruffing's Taproot proof and BIP 86?"* The wiki answers with citations — and in the process surfaces the gap: 70-90% of BIP 86 outputs can't use the escape hatch. That's a thread I wouldn't have pulled linearly. Query mode is where llm-wiki stops being a filing cabinet and starts being a research partner. **Output, last.** The articles on bitcoin

Quantum FUD is only fought with the best slop. It's all about inverting Brandolini's law. Part 2

X (formerly Twitter)

nvk 🌞 (@nvk) on X

The Quantum Computer That Will 'Kill Bitcoin' Just Lost to an Abacus🤭 - Part 2

Part 1 https://x.com/compose/articles/edit/2040989355330678784

Ask Grok mcp for Claude to be able to search X

GitHub

GitHub - nvk/ask-grok-mcp

Contribute to nvk/ask-grok-mcp development by creating an account on GitHub.