When a doomsday cult's prediction is proven wrong they don't change their mind, they change their narrative.
Aaron van Wirdum
npub1art8...m0w5
Author of The Genesis Book.
Former Editor-in-Chief at Bitcoin Magazine.
Notes (4)
Censorship resistant transactions in the hardest money ever invented will be in high demand, and will out-price other forms of data storage.
If that assumption is wrong, Bitcoin’s design is fundamentally flawed, and those of us who do want electronic cash should go back to the drawing board.
(I don’t believe the assumption is wrong.)
"You don't nuke and ant, you don't nuke a mosquito. You don't fight spam with consensus. [...] It's not a game of whack-a-mole where you can realistically fight it with consensus changes."
- nostr:npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr
https://youtu.be/Ie1D-fWR_tY?si=jaWTFN0JaNlMjjhr&t=1167
One irony of nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7l3vw43's CASF (CSAM activated soft fork) is that users would have to go and see that there's ndeed CSAM in an OP_RETURN, which AFAIK would actually be illegal. (I know I certainly won't do it.)