We constantly want more, and there's nothing wrong with that. But when we stop wanting more and better things, it means our souls have died, and all that remains in this world is a walking shell. So, even on my deathbed, I might want to see more beautiful women. But more importantly, I don't want to change my mindset. 😄🤣

The battle between traditional finance and blockchain finance has only just begun, and it will be a long and fierce struggle. The old guard will not easily relinquish such astronomical wealth. / If horse-drawn carriages disappeared, would people stop traveling? Of course not; they would switch to cars and trains. The wealth that originally belonged to horse-drawn carriages didn't disappear; it simply transferred to giants in the emerging automotive technology field. / If film disappeared, would people stop taking pictures? Of course not; they would switch to digital cameras. The wealth that originally belonged to film and film cameras didn't disappear; it simply transferred to giants in the emerging digital camera technology field. / Similarly, if traditional banks disappeared, would people still need finance? Of course they would; they would use blockchain-based financial services. The enormous wealth that originally belonged to traditional financial giants wouldn't disappear; it simply transferred to financial elites in blockchain technology. / Among the unsung heroes who have mastered this technology, some will become giants of the future financial world in this massive transfer of wealth.

Those who try to suppress blockchain-based finance should look back at Kodak. Kodak was once the world's leading film manufacturer and a Fortune 500 company. However, the rise of new digital technologies failed to garner sufficient attention from Kodak. Digital technology, which doesn't require film, was devastating for Kodak, whose core business was film. Fearful and slow to react, Kodak missed the opportunity to transform itself in the face of emerging digital technology. Ultimately, film disappeared from the world, not digital cameras. The same thing will happen in the blockchain finance sector; what will ultimately disappear is traditional finance, not Bitcoin.

I'm never pessimistic about Bitcoin. 21 million is the theoretical maximum, but due to various uncontrollable factors, the actual number of Bitcoins in use will be far less than 21 million. Bitcoin's current situation seems more like the result of deliberate suppression. Traditional finance has developed for hundreds of years, while emerging blockchain-based finance has only been around for a little over a decade. However, its rapid development has already caused panic in traditional finance. Once traditional finance is replaced by blockchain-based finance, it will plunge established financial giants into despair, while those with technological prowess in blockchain-based finance will rise to prominence. This is an unprecedented and massive exchange of interests. This is inevitable, as irreversible as the advent of the automobile inevitably replacing the horse-drawn carriage. View quoted note →

I have a way to earn $10,000 a month, do you want to know? However, the consultation fee is $100. / If you pay me $100, I'll tell you the secret: "Go find 100 idiots like you as soon as possible. If you can find them in a week, you can earn $10,000 a week."

Hey buddy! You've overlooked the most important thing: "Creating the next generation." 🤣 View quoted note →

No matter how strong the wind and rain, nothing can extinguish my burning passion for 2026, when more Bitcoins will enter my pocket。 🤣

Many people don't pay attention to mild illnesses, thinking it's unnecessary to bother a doctor, especially since it costs money. This view is completely wrong. If you see a doctor when your condition is mild, it's much easier to treat and the medical costs will be much lower. Waiting until the condition becomes serious before seeing a doctor not only incurs huge medical expenses but also makes it much more difficult to cure. Remember this: "Always see a doctor promptly when your symptoms are mild."

Many have heard the phrase "Never back down, no matter what." But reality is not always so simple. Sometimes you must retreat; facing a powerful enemy, refusing to retreat will only lead to utter destruction. Retreat is about preserving strength for a future comeback. The decision to retreat or not should be based on the actual situation, not rigid dogma.

An unfortunate father just had a paternity test done with his son... View quoted note →

People's increasing reliance on mobile phones has caused concern for many. But what's there to worry about? Humans initially relied on bamboo, wood, stone, animal hides, etc., to carve characters and transmit information. Then paper appeared, and humans became increasingly reliant on it for communication. Later, the telegraph appeared, and humans relied more and more on radio waves. Then computers and telephones appeared, and humans relied more and more on them for communication. Now, people are increasingly reliant on mobile phones for communication… Is there anything wrong with this? What's there to worry about?

This world is full of tragedies; some people are optimistic and resilient, while others are miserable and desperate. They may have been born disabled, or they may have experienced war, disease, car accidents, fires… In short, their lives are filled with hardship, for countless reasons. They deserve compassion and help. However, a bizarre view has emerged: some people's tragic experiences have become reasons for others to advise others to give up the pursuit of happiness? They will preach, "If you feel unhappy, go look at them!" I simply cannot understand why I should feel happy just because I see others living in misfortune. Seeing those in war, those with missing limbs, or those dying from illness… while I may be struggling to make ends meet, unable to pay rent, unable to pay my children's school fees… seeing those whose circumstances are worse than mine, should I feel happy? Am I crazy? This so-called "happiness" actually stems from the misfortune of others. Just because others' lives are worse than mine, should I feel happy? If this harmful thinking continues, wouldn't everyone want others to be more unhappy and miserable? Because as long as you're more miserable than me, I'll be happy.