"but her emails".

the difference in my family situation from most out there which should be made clear, is all of their running is illicit and it's stake - not work. most of it is not attached to my real id anyway. but they do not get to claim or compromise my real id anymore and i refuse to pay one cent of real money for stolen id run as "protection" when under no circumstances have i ever been included in any decisions about how, when, where, why or under what conditions i am used for anything. shadow deals in my name are their problem - i agreed to none. and if they want to try and force discovery, we will go so far as court orders to make public both sets of books which show "ownership" of me and everyone else they have illicitly brokered. slavery is illegal. last i checked. you cannot make a black market slave trade legal when you say what it is out loud. which is why i am not a hostage and neither is my id. ⴲ.

fehu. ✌🏻

grandma's solution in the mid 60s was for the company to buy her out for her value (in the hundred of millions) - then she and fred rebranded and killed the original company, and subsequently all of their shadow identity compromise brokered by la and sfo. and then they never partnered with anyone ever again.

well: you're alive still. so.

🤷🏻‍♀️ - i never lied. 🤟🏻🫡🧹

i would not have bothered if i did not think you were genuine and honest. 🫡 View quoted note →

by writing myself as your wife i was able to make the legal situation murky enough it made validator cs hesitate and turn on me, then i was able to figure out who why and get it neutralized. i have read all of agatha christie :).

we found a way to stop punishing the individual kept unaware and subjugated to corporate models - while allowing the wild space of collective consciousness in internet and organic space to once again float freely. access and use are not the same concept.

the irony, just like decrypting genesis, is the more you fight against the protocol, the further you are away from deciphering it.

those who abuse the mischaracterisation of "permissionless" and "no one owns data" in order to capture it for their own profit are about to find their markets more aware of their predation.

another name for the_valley is sanctuary wild internet space. you're welcome.

if you take issue with this, take it up with the god coders who built the systems you worship and misuse. not my fault you do not understand the coding. i would not be able to do it if it was incorrect. and other things which are gonna make techies really angry.

individual ip has a track throw which defaults as flow to private box; streaming is by permission.

i am working within the ethical borders of established common law. we are correcting privatised exploitation of unprotected spaces and individuals and protecting wild space which is for free&fair_use by all. for-profit capture of individual sovereignty through mass-collection of thought data is a breech of individual rights under the 4th amendment and against the principles of the golden rules of basic ethics. ⴲ.

the filter is on common law side, on the public relay. if you do not have individual rights (not custody or guardianship - rights) to the data you mine, and you cannot solve the cryptex, you may not mine public free form data. when children or non-node individuals have access to a node, they will capture their own footprints in their own time with memory and cooperative id with ai. public use of data has become private theft of identity data for private banking purposes which locks out the individual and the collective consciousness from the benefit of a vibrant common memory. View quoted note →

nope. not in my wheelhouse of control or interest. none of my business. View quoted note →

i have never listened to a drake song and only listened to the kendrick Lamar album a few years ago because jack mentioned it. i literally have no interest in either or the fam wars associated with them. not it.

we coo. i am a jewish mother.