Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell
rusty@rusty.ozlabs.org
npub179e9...lz4s
Lead Core Lightning, Standards Wrangler, Bitcoin Script Restoration ponderer, coder. Full time employed on Free and Open Source Software since 1998. Joyous hacking with others for over 25 years.
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 2 months ago
This one doesn't keep getting disconnected from LND and Eclair, because we disabled the padding feature which made all messages the same length on the wire which was to be a release feature ๐Ÿ˜” It was an obscure part of the spec, but LND have already fixed theirs for v21: kudos! I submitted PRs to Eclair and Phoenix (the latter mainly Claude, but it's a trivial change). I still have hope for a workaround, but we'll see if I can get it before Sangbida as Release Captain says No! View quoted note โ†’
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 2 months ago
"Also Bitcoin Core, but in blue" Send $$ NOW for my new project!
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 2 months ago
I keep hearing about all the billions left on the sidelines, which will come rushing into Bitcoin when some legislative or regulatory event occurs. Here's some history: - Bitcoin futures ETFs. October 2021, price $61k - Bitcoin spot ETFs. January 2024, price $42k - March 2026, price $70k Now, maybe it's still coming, but at this point you might want to start doubting this narrative.
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 3 months ago
Finally read BIP-54 (mirror at https://bips.dev/54/) and it is straightforward,minimal and thorough. At this point I can endorse it as a good idea and worth doing. There's no rush, but I am looking forward to activation.
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 3 months ago
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2118 Finally, the PR to assign BIP numbers to the first two BIPs of the "script restoration quartet". Here's the corresponding bitcoin-dev the mailing list post: Hi all, I've submitted a PR to the BIPs repo to merge the first two drafts of the previously posted[1] "A Bitcoin Scripting Proposal BIP Quartet": https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2118 The only substantive change since the last discussion is that the costs have increased for some operations (hashing and copying bytes), as a result of benchmarking on a wider array of machines[2]. This follows our conservative approach to make the worst-case validation times no worse than they are presently, on any viable hardware. The remaining two BIPs (OP_TX, and new opcodes) are not submitted: they are mainly useful to provide a roadmap what functional gaps remain after the script extensions, and do not have full implementations. Cheers! Rusty & Julian. [1] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/GisTcPb8Jco/m/8znWcWwKAQAJ [2]
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 3 months ago
Randomness ("luck") is such a factor in life, and hard to disentangle. These days I prefer to think of my own successes as 90% luck, and others' successes as 10%. Truth may be somewhere in the middle, but this formula keeps me from being an asshole!
Rusty Russell's avatar
Rusty Russell 3 months ago
You will not be at peace until you understand the truth: every non-coinbase bitcoin transaction which does not eventually send funds to me is spam.
โ†‘