A big thank you to @Leathermint for creating and sharing this prototype carrying pouch designed specifically for @fk2bit's premium aluminum SeedSigner enclosures. Curious to hear your impressions, please share any thoughts in the comments. 🧡 🙏

Motherfu... View quoted note →

View quoted note → 🧡

Excited to be attending the Sound Money Soiré this weekend in Tampa...

Seedsigner tutorial for a Spanish-speaking audience:

View quoted note → FOSH in the wild. 🧡

Nom nom nom... Down to 26 sats/vbyte.

View quoted note → I love this stuff...

View quoted note → Interoperable protocols FTW. 🙂

View quoted note → I will be headed to Tampa for this event as well -- if you're anywhere near enough that it makes sense to go, seems like it's going to be a great time for a great cause.

Some ideas about batching and the mental overhead associated with v4v: Underlying perceived issue: the mental overhead associated with to-zap-or-not-to-zap still seems way too high to allow most individual content creators to benefit from v4v in a meaningful way. Unless Nostr users are confronted with a request to zap, or are overwhelmingly impressed with an individual piece of content, and thus reminded to zap, human beings, being efficient, avoid the mental strain altogether and don't engage in the to-zap-or-not-to-zap decision making process and the mental energy that it requires. Seems more productive that users be might allowed to opt-in to purchasing micro-bites of content over time, at a certain price, and of course are allowed to opt-out at any time. Like subscribing to a paid substack, but on a much smaller scale. An example of how this concept might work -- to be able to view a certain person's Nostr posts in an ongoing fashion, you agree to auto-zap 50 sats per post, with a max of 5 zaps per day, and/or a max of XXX sats per month, whatever makes sense. If they post more than that, you get to view those posts at no cost. If they post less than that, you only have to pay for what they do post. The content creator sets these prices with ongoing feedback from "the market". If followers perceive the quality of a user's posts they've subscribed to going down, they hit the "unsubscribe" button. Subscribers periodically review their subscriptions and total amount spent on v4v content, and adjust their subscriptions according to the value they feel they are receiving. Accounts to which users are subscribed are incentivized, but not overly-pressured, to produce quality content that others will enjoy consuming, and are rewarded for doing so. The market works out how much individual content creators should be paid, and at a higher level, incentivizes ongoing production of quality content. Many users will still post at no cost, wanting their content to be freely available for ideological reasons, or because they don't want their reach limited in any way, or because it just doesn't make sense to attempt to charge for it, and this is of course 100% fine. Not going to spend any more time thinking on this right now, just throwing it out there for consideration, feel free to hate on the concept as much as you want, LoL.

Not sure if this will be an unpopular take but... Obscuring all of the technical detail from people holding private keys -- essentially giving them an "easy button" -- can often result in them feeling less confident about the keys because they don't have any sense of what's going under the hood. Letting them get their hands a little dirty, letting them work with bitcoin primatives (especially ones that are portable between different tools), can help to significantly increase the confidence with which people hold their keys.

Was alerted by one of our contributors that our development fund received a ~22 million sat donation on Christmas day. What a wonderful gesture -- to whomever sent this, we immensely appreciate it! 🧡

Less price talk, more freedom talk.

"...I can feel your soul in this product." It is indeed in there. 🫶

This is so cool! This keychain tether sent to me by Orange Manufacturing Group has our dev fund lnurl on the inside as a QR code, and an embedded NFC chip that links to

SeedSigner: Air-gapped DIY Bitcoin Signing Device

SeedSigner: Air-gapped DIY Bitcoin Signing Device

BUILD YOUR OWN BITCOIN SIGNING DEVICE using a raspberry pi zero (VERSION 1.3) You can build an offline, air-gapped Bitcoin transaction signing devi...

If you want to test out the QR code with your LN wallet, you know, just to make sure it works, I'm totally on board with that... 🤪

View quoted note → Statements like this are what motivate myself and many of our contributors to continue to push forward.

View quoted note → And yes, it can run on SeedSigner... 😂 (video courtesy of @Nathan Day)