A's avatar
A
npub17lm4...8t66
Not much to say.
A's avatar
A 8 months ago
Is #frostr essentially a multisig lightning wallet? #asknostr
A's avatar
A 8 months ago
I wonder if it’s more viable for them to buy a controlling or influential stake in Strategy than it is to compete against Strategy in accumulating Bitcoin View quoted note →
A's avatar
A 8 months ago
Honest question: If you don’t let people who exercise their free speech, how will potential threats voluntarily do the hard work for you of making themselves known? Or is it just that if you are in a position to suppress speech, you view everyone as a potential threat? I suppose that’s also an easy solution. View quoted note →
A's avatar
A 8 months ago
This is for the benefit of normies? Those people who don’t understand Bitcoin? Who don’t have Bitcoin? Fuck it. Let’s call Sats ‘Teeth’ and Bitcoin ‘Mandibles’. They’ll get it soon enough… View quoted note →
A's avatar
A 8 months ago
As a Bitcoiner, you FEEL Bitcoin within you, down to your core. In Nostr, you experience being in Bitcoin. It’s a world where the values of Bitcoin come alive. Freedom of association. Self sovereignty. And so on. These experiences are why this is the happiest place in the internet. Imagine, someday, the world of atoms will be just like this. View quoted note →
A's avatar
A 9 months ago
How does #telegram have more #bitcoin content than ##nostr ? So. Many. Channels.
A's avatar
A 9 months ago
image Not saying that I think about Bitcoin constantly, but there are signs.
A's avatar
A 9 months ago
This is not good PR, whether he’s right or wrong. Doesn’t send a strong signal that he knows how to run a company. If a utility or Coke stopped issuing dividends, their shareholders would revolt. That’s why they’re there. But if Berkshire Hathaway issued a dividend, its shareholders would lose confidence in its management. For Bitcoin Treasury Companies to maintain support of its retail shareholders, Bitcoin must never be sold. In this case, less than 2% of all shares are listed, right? This stock doesn’t seem to be for regular people or follow the ethos of a P2P system. Bitcoin was supposed to be for the people, and this is a reminder it’s moving further away from that. But then again, Bitcoin is for enemies and Bitcoin doesn’t care.
A's avatar
A 9 months ago
Almost. It’s leveraging debt and LP equity and common stocks via ATM issuances and likely preferred equity onto companies that leverage LP equity and common stocks via ATM share issuances and preferred equity on top of the currency risk leverage of dollar returns from Bitcoin. View quoted note →
A's avatar
A 9 months ago
I’ve been thinking about the funds and companies that use Bitcoin as a hurdle rate and accept investments in Bitcoin. It’s kind of mind bending at first to earn more Bitcoin from Bitcoin when it’s a hard asset. It has me wondering, can this be applied to other fixed and declining resources as well… such as time? Remove anything monetary as a form of measurement and solely measure in time. What would be the KPI’s of time? Such as investing time, spending time, and receiving more time, on productive ventures. All time management I’m aware of are measuring the equivalence of data and pennies. A book of accounts for time that looks at months, quarters, and years. Not just backwards looking but forward looking as well. Trajectory planning- the Finance equivalent for time.
A's avatar
A 9 months ago
Help me out with my logic. I’m sure it’s flawed: I don’t believe Bitcoin “influencers” are serious people if they are not active on Nostr, or not on Nostr at all. #asknostr