meh. its alright. View quoted note →

woke up to the pond overflowing OVER the dam. its not supposed to do that. been digging a drainage trench in the rain for a couple hours now. taking breaks to shitpost. its a simple life 😊

spicy take forking to burn peoples money is NOT compromising censorship resistance. because they aren't resisting the censorship by moving to a quantum-safe signature scheme. duh View quoted note →

but fr tho suppose you had the first QC what would you do? but then after you steal Satoshis coins, where would you send them? how do you know the Chinese arent just days away from having one themselves and stealing them back? the first thing you would need IS A QUANTUM SAFE SIGNATURE SCHEME TO HIDE THE COINS IN !! I'm convinced these people concerned with QC *already have one* they just need a safe place to put their stolen goods 🤔

seems like a good time to remind everyone that "rights" are a social fiction. victori spolia. View quoted note →

badass 👏 View quoted note →

this is @Super Testnet suggesting that #monero has a UX problem because a TARGETED attack by a SOPHISTICATED attacker sending a custom transaction *could link together ownership of two different subaddresses (if the monero user had shared both of them with the adversary of course) meanwhile in the VAST majority of the ways LN is actually used, ALL your sends and receives are trivially known by someone to belong to a single entity. because you're using a custodian. or you only have one or two fat channels with a LSP. what to do to get transaction unlinkability?? no problem! Just run a full-stack #Bitcoin lightning routing node! Open lots of channels and tie up your liquidity while fees are low! You can establish plausible deniability for your LN txs and not have to worry if the FBI is sending custom txs to link your monero subaddresses together. easypeasy! anyone who has run a LN node can confirm you can just "set-it and forget it." Just like making a monero node available over tor! ok. I'm done. View quoted note →