Don't ask me who, but someone created this service where you can buy KYC free mined sats via hash rental.
Nothing technical to do except pay sats and submit a fresh address to receive.
The "fixed" option takes sats from a pool of sats that have already been mined - supply limited. Payment happens within 24 hrs.
The variable options available are "slow" and "fast", where you have to wait 5 or 30 days for the sats to be mined for you. The returns depend on Ocean's luck.
Sometimes you can get more sats than you put in, sometimes fewer. The slower option reduce wild swings in returns.
The difference between variable and fixed is that with fixed, you know precisely how much you get back, returns are within 24 hrs, and there are caps on the amount due to availability (fluctuates).
It's all explained on the site, and you can send questions by email.
Oh, there's also a "private deal" option which requires email enquiry to discuss and initiate.
All sats mined contribute to signalling for Bitcoin to be used as money (RDTS; BIP 110 via Ocean).
There are no more cycles. You buy bitcoin because it's becoming money and you're disgusted using money others can create for free.
You can order a ready-made, fully Bitcoin-synced Laptop node (ParmanodL) which has the Parmanode software installed, configured, and tested, delivered to anywhere in the world (except Eptstein's Island, sorry Andy).
People don't understand you can buy mined #ƨats with your KYC sats.
BIP 110 - read it, don't be told how to think, Bitcoiner.
There was beautiful and touching obituary to Matt Odell's reputation today.
Running BIP 110
On BIP 110, miners, and chain splits...
It's helpful to separate miners who want fiat, and miners who want bitcoin.
It's fundamental, and no one does this.
Miners who want bitcoin, are part of the choice of soft fork, their opinion and the node they choose matters. Effectively they are nodes (Nodes are people who want bitcoin, and actively choose to enforce their rules).
Miners (who want fiat) work for Bitcoiners. Their opinions don't matter.
Suppose all miners were fiat people and not supportive of BIp110, and suppose every node runner supported bip110...
The nodes that the miners in this case run, say core 30, are irrelevant because these people don't want to accumulate bitcoin, and so they don't contribute to the value of that version of bitcoin (whichever version they choose matters little because they aren't accumulating the coin, they're selling it after mining).
If they choose against nodes, they are mining a coin Bitcoiners don't want - it has no value ultimately, even if it has the highest hashpower. It's a hash-secured worthless coin.
The valuable version (valuable because all people who want bitcoin choose to accumulate it) will have less hashpower. But because it's valuable, miners will defect to mine it and earn fiat (and difficulty being low will make it lucrative for those in first).
Ultimately, one must understand that mining doesn't give bitcoin value, it only helps it function, it's PEOPLE WHO WANT IT that give it value, and if these people run nodes, they get a say in what it is.
If anyone wants a video of how to enable BIP110 on Parmanode, here it is. Please share.
The reason Bitcoin is not going up is because you're being stubborn and not getting a ParmanodL Bitcoin laptop node.
I'm not angry.
I'm just disappointed.
Especially you,
@Michael SaylorBuy bitcoin and play Bach.
Hurry up, life is short.
If someone were to be playing a racing simulation game like Gran Turismo, doing laps and honing their skills, a person watching might get insanely bored, but the person playing could be in the zone, forgetting all their troubles, and highly focussed, while having a great time...
This is what I think it's like to hear someone playing Bach, vs playing Bach yourself.
I promise, it's incredible. It's not just some melody you might like to hum along to or not - there is so much going on on so many levels.
I wish for you to experience it.
I'm sorry to have to bring you this news, but you need significantly more bitcoin than you currently have today.
Filters
All opinions of people with blue hair, or who run a Core v30 Bitcoin node, can be safely disregarded without any negative consequences.
The conversation in Australia has turned into arguing against statist cucks about extra gun laws (hardly anyone has a gun anyway).
Remember long, long ago (last week) when it was about banning social media for kids as an excuse to attack privacy on the internet for all?
Magically, no one is talking about that now, too busy fighting the fallout of leftist and bots about guns.
The foundation of technical analysis...
If the price goes one way, then it keeps going that way, because momentum, but if it turns around, then it goes the other way with the new momentum, and keeps going that way.
Unless it turns around.
Triangles help, Daniel San. Always triangle. Close eye.
Everyone who is part of your inheritance circle can come to ParmaDon for assistance.
If your friend has never called you a cunt, then, I hate to break this to you, but you're not actually friends.
Of course the other possibility is that you're a really nice person 😬
Once upon a time, someone exploited a bug and got 184 billion bitcoins.
The VALID TRANSACTIONS were rugged by Satoshi to keep bitcoin going.
Today, another exploit (that Core refuses to acknowledge or fix) is damaging Bitcoin.
Similarly to the previous bug fix, where a malicious exploiter was rugged, should "valid transaction" be a reason to not fix Bitcoin?
It requires consensus that fixing a life threatening bug overrides immutability.
It's uncomfortable to talk about, but if you think about it, OF COURSE the survival of Bitcoin logically supercedes immutability.
And so, the debate should be about if this is really going to destroy Bitcoin if left unchecked. That conversation is being drowned out by appealing to less important principles of money.
I think we should first determine that, then encourage discussions about how to fix it, always remembering that the highest principle is Bitcoin surviving as digital sound money for the world.
It's OK to entertain an idea, like rugging malicious spammers, perhaps deciding against it, or not, or finding an alternative.
It was easier to fix when Satoshi was in charge and Bitcoin wasn't decentralised, now we all have to decide, all while the enemy is sending bots, and Adam Back, to muddy the waters and distract us from the most important conversations.