ImYour Huckleberry

#CharlieKirk #Ambassador #BridgeBuilder #Negotiator #Assassinatied #Murdered #Martyr

#CharlieKirk #Assassinated

THEY JUST MADE A MARTYR! #assassination #murder #outrage #war #CharlieKirk #RIP

THEY JUST MADE A MARTYR! #assassination #murder #outrage #war #CharlieKirk #RIP

https://youtu.be/JZJYU4OEjwU S2 Underground Nexus (Submit Tips Here): https://nexus-s2underground.hub.arcgi... Research Notes/Bibliography can be found here: https://publish.obsidian.md/s2undergr... Common Intelligence Picture: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html... Border Crisis Map: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html... TOC Dashboard: https://experience.arcgis.com/experie... 00:00 - Global Strategic Concerns 05:35 - Strategic Movement 07:50 - Mass Shooter Stopped 10:48 - Venezuela 13:43 - Dundee Scandal 17:45 - GhostNet Reports Download the GhostNet plan here! https://github.com/s2underground/Ghos... The text version of the Wire can be found on Twitter: / s2_underground And on our Wire Telegram page here: https://t.me/S2undergroundWire If you would like to support us, we're on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/user?u=30479515 Disclaimer: No company sponsored this video. In fact, we have ZERO sponsors. We are funded 100% by you, the viewer. All of our funding comes from direct support from platforms like Patreon, or from ad revenue on YouTube. Without your support, I simply could not do this work at all, so to those of you who chose to support my efforts, I am eternally thankful. Odysee: https://odysee.com/@S2Underground:7 Gab: https://gab.com/S2underground Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/S2Underground BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/P2NM... Just a few reminders for everyone who's just become aware of us, in order to keep these briefings from being several hours long, I can't cover everything. I'm probably covering 1% of the world events when we conduct these briefings, so please remember that if I left it out, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's unimportant. Also, remember that I do these briefings quite often, so I might have covered an issue previously that you might not see if you are only watching our most recent videos. I'm also doing this in my spare time, so again I fully admit that these briefings aren't even close to being perfect; I'm going for a healthy blend of speed and quality. If I were to wait and only post a brief when it's "perfect" I would never post anything at all. So expect some minor errors here and there. If there is a major error or correction that needs to be made, I will post it here in the description, and verbally address it in the next briefing. Also, thanks for reading this far. It is always surprising the number of people that don't actually read the description box to find more information. #S2Underground #SigInt #HumInt #Intelligence #Briefing #TheWire

I want input from people with real experience: Do you agree with Grok? Synopsis: Krav Maga is best for most people for real world scenarios. ________________________________ Query: Martial arts often advertise being "the best" for defense/attack. 1) Discounting fair play and tournament rules, which is the most effective at defense and the best at offense? Include permanently disabling and deadly techniques in the equation. 2) Prioritize quick fight resolution and presence of fire arms and knives 3) Other practitioners often criticize Krav Maga. Why? 4) Would any of your analysis change if the practitioner also carried a concealed pistol? GROK: 1) When evaluating martial arts for effectiveness in defense and offense, especially in scenarios without rules where permanently disabling or deadly techniques are considered, the context of "effectiveness" depends on several factors: the practitioner's skill, physical attributes, the environment, and the specific threat (e.g., armed vs. unarmed, single vs. multiple attackers). No single martial art is universally "the best," but some are better suited for specific scenarios due to their focus, techniques, and training methods. Below, I’ll analyze martial arts for defense (neutralizing threats while minimizing harm to oneself) and offense (incapacitating or eliminating an opponent), including permanently disabling and lethal techniques.Key ConsiderationsDefense: Prioritizes evasion, redirection, control, and escape to avoid injury. Techniques like joint locks, throws, and evasion are critical, as is situational awareness. Offense: Focuses on quickly incapacitating or neutralizing an opponent, potentially with lethal or permanently disabling strikes, chokes, or weapon use. No Rules Context: In real-world scenarios without fair play, techniques targeting vital areas (eyes, throat, groin, spine) or using weapons become highly relevant. Training Realism: Martial arts with live sparring, pressure testing, and scenario-based training tend to be more effective than those relying on forms or compliant drills. Most Effective for DefenseKrav MagaWhy: Developed by the Israeli military, Krav Maga emphasizes practical self-defense against real-world threats, including armed attackers, multiple assailants, and ambushes. It prioritizes evasion, de-escalation, and rapid neutralization to escape danger. Defensive Strengths:Teaches situational awareness to avoid or preempt attacks. Focuses on defending against punches, kicks, grabs, knives, guns, and improvised weapons. Uses instinctive movements and redirection (e.g., blocking knife thrusts while counterattacking). Includes techniques to disengage and flee, critical for survival. Disabling/Lethal Potential: While defense-focused, Krav Maga incorporates strikes to vulnerable areas (eyes, throat, groin) to stop attackers, which can be permanently disabling or lethal if necessary. Evidence: Used by military and law enforcement globally, with training emphasizing stress drills and realistic scenarios, making it highly effective for defense in chaotic situations. Aikido (with caveats)Why: Aikido focuses on redirecting an attacker’s energy, using joint locks and throws to neutralize threats without causing excessive harm. Defensive Strengths:Excels at controlling an attacker’s momentum, ideal for de-escalating single unarmed assailants. Techniques like wrist locks (e.g., nikyo, sankyo) can subdue opponents without striking. Emphasizes circular movements to evade and reposition, minimizing exposure to harm. Disabling/Lethal Potential: While not inherently lethal, misapplied joint locks or throws (e.g., onto hard surfaces) can break bones or cause concussions, potentially disabling an opponent permanently. Caveats: Aikido’s effectiveness depends heavily on the practitioner’s skill and the attacker’s commitment. It’s less effective against multiple attackers or weapons unless paired with other systems. Honorable Mention: Judo is excellent for defense in grappling scenarios, using throws and pins to control opponents without striking. However, it’s less versatile against weapons or multiple attackers compared to Krav Maga.Most Effective for OffenseMuay Thai (combined with clinch work)Why: Known as “the art of eight limbs,” Muay Thai uses punches, kicks, elbows, and knees to deliver devastating strikes, making it one of the most effective striking arts for offense. Offensive Strengths:Elbows and knees can shatter bones (e.g., skull, ribs) or cause internal injuries, potentially lethal or permanently disabling. Leg kicks can destroy an opponent’s mobility, targeting thighs or knees. Clinch work allows control of an opponent’s posture, setting up knees to the head or body, which can knock out or kill. Disabling/Lethal Potential: Strikes to the temple, neck, or liver can cause concussions, unconsciousness, or organ damage. In a no-rules context, repeated elbows to the head or stomps on a downed opponent can be fatal. Evidence: Muay Thai fighters dominate in mixed martial arts (MMA) striking exchanges, and its techniques are used by militaries (e.g., Thai military). Real-world effectiveness is enhanced by its brutal conditioning and sparring. Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) with a focus on submissionWhy: BJJ excels in grappling, allowing a smaller person to control and submit a larger opponent, especially on the ground. Offensive Strengths:Chokes (e.g., rear naked choke, guillotine) can render an opponent unconscious in seconds or cause death if held too long. Joint locks (e.g., armbars, leg locks) can break limbs, permanently disabling an opponent. Positional dominance (e.g., mount) allows for ground-and-pound strikes, which can be lethal in a no-rules scenario. Disabling/Lethal Potential: Chokes targeting the carotid artery can kill if not released, and joint locks can destroy ligaments or joints, ending a fight decisively. Caveats: BJJ is less effective against multiple attackers or weapons and requires ground engagement, which may be risky in street scenarios. Honorable Mention: Combat Sambo blends striking, grappling, and weapons training, with lethal techniques like neck cranks and targeted strikes. It’s highly effective but less accessible than Muay Thai or BJJ.Additional NotesWeapons-Based Arts: Systems like Kali/Eskrima (Filipino martial arts) are devastating in offense and defense when weapons (knives, sticks) are involved. Disarming techniques are defensive, while slashes or stabs to vital areas are lethal. However, their effectiveness drops without weapons. Hybrid Training: Modern combat sports like MMA combine Muay Thai, BJJ, wrestling, and boxing, creating well-rounded fighters. In a no-rules context, an MMA-trained fighter with Krav Maga’s situational awareness would be nearly unbeatable. Lethality and Ethics: Permanently disabling or lethal techniques (e.g., eye gouges, throat strikes, spinal attacks) are taught in systems like Krav Maga or military combatives but carry legal and ethical consequences. Their use should be a last resort. Training Quality: A poorly trained Krav Maga practitioner may lose to a skilled boxer. Effectiveness hinges on realistic training, not just the style. ConclusionBest for Defense: Krav Maga is the most effective due to its focus on real-world threats, situational awareness, and rapid escape, with the ability to escalate to disabling techniques if needed. Best for Offense: Muay Thai edges out due to its immediate, devastating striking power, capable of permanently disabling or killing with elbows, knees, or kicks. BJJ is a close second for controlled, lethal submissions in one-on-one scenarios. If you want a single system, Krav Maga offers a balance of defense and offense, incorporating elements of Muay Thai, BJJ, and weapons training. For maximum effectiveness, cross-training in Muay Thai and BJJ, supplemented with Krav Maga’s practical mindset, would create a formidable fighter in no-rules scenarios. 2) When prioritizing quick fight resolution and accounting for the presence of firearms and knives in a no-rules, real-world scenario, the effectiveness of martial arts for defense (neutralizing threats to escape) and offense (rapidly incapacitating or eliminating an opponent) shifts toward systems designed for high-stakes, weapon-heavy encounters. Permanently disabling or lethal techniques are considered, as per your request. Below, I evaluate martial arts with these priorities, focusing on rapid resolution and weapon threats.Key ConsiderationsQuick Fight Resolution: Techniques must incapacitate or control an opponent in seconds, prioritizing strikes, submissions, or disarms that end fights immediately. Firearms and Knives: The martial art must address armed threats (e.g., disarming, closing distance, or neutralizing before the weapon is used). No Rules: Lethal or permanently disabling techniques (e.g., strikes to vital areas, joint destruction, choking) are viable, with no regard for tournament restrictions. Training Realism: Systems with live, high-pressure training against weapons are prioritized. Most Effective for DefenseKrav MagaWhy: Krav Maga is designed for real-world self-defense, specifically against armed attackers (firearms, knives, blunt weapons). It emphasizes rapid threat neutralization and escape, ideal for quick resolution. Defensive Strengths:Firearms: Teaches gun disarms (e.g., redirecting the barrel, controlling the wrist) to neutralize shooters at close range, often within 1–2 seconds. Training includes defending against handguns and rifles under stress. Knives: Focuses on blocking, redirecting, and controlling knife attacks (e.g., 360-degree defense) while counterattacking vulnerable areas (eyes, throat, groin) to escape. Prioritizes situational awareness to avoid or de-escalate armed encounters. Stress drills simulate real-world chaos, enhancing decision-making under pressure. Disabling/Lethal Potential: Defensive moves often transition to counterattacks, like groin kicks or eye gouges, which can permanently disable or kill if needed (e.g., crushing the trachea or breaking the neck during a disarm). Evidence: Used by Israeli Defense Forces and law enforcement globally, with techniques proven in high-threat environments. Its focus on instinctive movements ensures rapid response. Honorable Mention: Kali/Eskrima (Filipino Martial Arts) excels in knife defense, using deflections, traps, and disarms to counter edged weapons. It’s less comprehensive against firearms compared to Krav Maga but highly effective for edged weapon defense.Most Effective for OffenseKrav Maga (again, with offensive focus)Why: While primarily defensive, Krav Maga’s offensive techniques are designed to end fights in seconds, even against armed opponents, by targeting vital areas with maximum force. Offensive Strengths:Firearms: If the practitioner gains control of a firearm (e.g., through a disarm), they’re trained to use it immediately, potentially lethal. Knives: Incorporates knife use for slashing or stabbing vital areas (e.g., neck, arteries), ensuring rapid incapacitation. Disarmed knives can be turned against the attacker. Strikes like elbows to the temple, knees to the groin, or palm strikes to the nose can cause concussions, broken bones, or death in one or two blows. Chokes (e.g., guillotine) or neck manipulations can kill or knock out in seconds. Disabling/Lethal Potential: Techniques like eye gouges, throat strikes, or stomps on a downed opponent’s head can permanently blind, paralyze, or kill. Knife slashes to major arteries or gunshots (post-disarm) are lethal. Evidence: Krav Maga’s offensive techniques are derived from military combatives, designed for quick kills in life-or-death situations. Muay Thai (with weapon integration)Why: Muay Thai’s brutal striking power, combined with clinch work, allows rapid incapacitation, even against armed opponents if the distance is closed. Offensive Strengths:Firearms: Less focus on firearms, but clinch control can prevent a shooter from aiming, followed by knees or elbows to the head for a knockout (potentially lethal). Knives: Elbows and knees can break bones or cause internal bleeding, disabling a knife-wielding attacker if preemptive strikes land. Low kicks to the knee can destroy mobility. A single elbow to the temple or knee to the liver can end a fight in under 5 seconds, with lethal potential (e.g., skull fractures, organ rupture). Disabling/Lethal Potential: Repeated strikes to the head, neck, or spine can kill or permanently disable. In a no-rules scenario, stomping a downed opponent’s head is devastatingly effective. Caveats: Muay Thai lacks specific firearm disarm training, making it secondary to Krav Maga in armed contexts, but its striking power is unmatched for rapid offense. Honorable Mention: Combat Sambo integrates striking, grappling, and weapons (knives, firearms), with lethal techniques like neck cranks or targeted stabs. It’s highly effective but less accessible than Krav Maga or Muay Thai.Why Krav Maga DominatesVersatility: Covers both firearms and knives, with specific disarming techniques and offensive counters, unlike Muay Thai (limited firearm training) or BJJ (less effective against weapons). Speed: Designed for fights to end in 3–10 seconds through disarms, strikes, or escapes, aligning with your priority for quick resolution. Weapon Focus: Explicitly trains against guns and knives, including scenarios with multiple attackers, making it more practical than pure striking or grappling arts. Lethality: Incorporates permanently disabling (e.g., joint breaks, eye gouges) and lethal techniques (e.g., throat strikes, using the attacker’s weapon) as needed. Contextual NotesFirearms: Against guns, distance and timing are critical. Krav Maga’s disarms work best at close range; at longer ranges, no martial art guarantees survival without cover or compliance. Knives: Knife attacks are chaotic and dangerous. Krav Maga and Kali prioritize controlling the weapon arm, but even skilled practitioners risk injury. Training Quality: A poorly trained Krav Maga practitioner may fail under pressure. Seek instructors with real-world experience (e.g., military/law enforcement backgrounds). Cross-Training: Combining Krav Maga’s weapon defenses with Muay Thai’s striking or BJJ’s submissions creates a near-unstoppable skill set for armed, no-rules scenarios. Legal/Ethical Risks: Lethal or disabling techniques (e.g., shooting a disarmed gunman, stabbing with a taken knife) carry severe legal consequences, even in self-defense. ConclusionBest for Defense: Krav Maga is unmatched for rapid defense against firearms and knives, with disarms and escapes designed to resolve threats in seconds. Best for Offense: Krav Maga again, due to its ability to disarm and use the opponent’s weapon (gun or knife) for lethal effect, though Muay Thai is a close second for its raw striking power if weapons are neutralized. For the fastest fight resolution against armed threats, Krav Maga is the top choice due to its comprehensive approach to both defense and offense in weapon-heavy scenarios. Cross-training with Muay Thai for striking power or Kali for advanced knife work could enhance effectiveness. 3) Krav Maga, despite its reputation for practical self-defense, faces criticism from practitioners of other martial arts. These criticisms stem from its training methods, philosophy, and perceived limitations. Below, I outline the main reasons for criticism, grounded in common perspectives and observations, while maintaining a concise and objective analysis.1. Perceived Lack of Technical DepthCriticism: Critics, especially from traditional martial arts (e.g., Karate, Taekwondo) or combat sports (e.g., Muay Thai, BJJ), argue Krav Maga lacks the technical refinement and depth of systems with centuries of development. Its techniques are seen as overly simplistic, relying on basic, instinctive movements rather than complex forms or nuanced skills. Reason: Krav Maga prioritizes quick-to-learn, high-impact techniques for real-world scenarios, often sacrificing finesse for practicality. For example, its strikes (e.g., groin kicks, eye gouges) are straightforward but effective, which traditionalists may view as "crude." Counterpoint: Simplicity is intentional, designed for non-athletes or beginners to defend themselves under stress in minimal training time. 2. Limited Sparring and Pressure TestingCriticism: Combat sports practitioners (e.g., MMA, boxing) often criticize Krav Maga for insufficient live sparring or full-contact training. They argue that without regular pressure testing against resisting opponents, practitioners may struggle to apply techniques in real fights. Reason: Some Krav Maga schools focus on scenario-based drills (e.g., defending against knife attacks) rather than competitive sparring, as the system avoids "sport" rules to emphasize lethal or disabling techniques (e.g., throat strikes). However, training quality varies, and some schools lack realistic resistance. Counterpoint: High-quality Krav Maga programs incorporate stress drills and simulations (e.g., defending against multiple attackers under fatigue), which mimic real-world chaos better than controlled sparring. 3. Overemphasis on AggressionCriticism: Some martial artists, particularly from disciplines like Aikido or Judo, critique Krav Maga’s aggressive approach, which often escalates to lethal or permanently disabling techniques (e.g., eye gouges, neck strikes). They argue this lacks control or de-escalation strategies. Reason: Krav Maga is designed for life-or-death situations, such as military or street encounters, where rapid neutralization is prioritized over restraint. This contrasts with arts emphasizing harmony or sport-based outcomes. Counterpoint: Krav Maga teaches situational awareness and de-escalation as first steps, but critics may focus only on its combative techniques. 4. Inconsistent Training QualityCriticism: Practitioners from systems with standardized curricula (e.g., BJJ, with its belt system) criticize Krav Maga for inconsistent instruction across schools. Some instructors are accused of being underqualified, leading to ineffective training. Reason: Krav Maga’s rapid global spread has led to variations in teaching quality, with some schools prioritizing profit over rigorous standards. Unlike BJJ or Judo, Krav Maga lacks a universal governing body to enforce consistency. Counterpoint: Reputable schools (e.g., those affiliated with the Israeli military or KMG) maintain high standards, and students can seek certified instructors with real-world experience. 5. Overhyped EffectivenessCriticism: Some martial artists argue Krav Maga’s marketing as “the ultimate self-defense system” is exaggerated, claiming it’s no better than other arts like Muay Thai or MMA in real fights. Critics point out that no system guarantees success, especially against weapons or multiple attackers. Reason: Krav Maga’s association with the Israeli military and bold advertising can create unrealistic expectations. Its focus on worst-case scenarios (e.g., gun disarms) may seem impractical to skeptics who prioritize proven combat sports techniques. Counterpoint: Krav Maga’s effectiveness lies in its scenario-specific training (e.g., firearms, knives), which addresses threats combat sports often ignore. Its real-world success is documented in military and law enforcement contexts. 6. Limited Ground FightingCriticism: BJJ and wrestling practitioners often highlight Krav Maga’s weak ground game, arguing it’s ineffective if a fight goes to the ground, a common occurrence in real-world altercations. Reason: Krav Maga emphasizes staying on your feet to escape or handle multiple attackers, with minimal focus on prolonged grappling. Its ground techniques are basic (e.g., escaping mounts, basic chokes) compared to BJJ’s sophisticated submissions. Counterpoint: Krav Maga avoids ground fighting intentionally, as it’s risky in street scenarios with weapons or multiple assailants. Some schools integrate BJJ principles to address this gap. 7. Ethical and Legal ConcernsCriticism: Practitioners of less aggressive arts (e.g., Aikido) criticize Krav Maga’s use of potentially lethal techniques, arguing they’re excessive or legally risky in civilian self-defense. Reason: Techniques like throat strikes or eye gouges are designed for extreme situations (e.g., military operations), which can seem disproportionate to civilian practitioners. Legal systems in many countries scrutinize such force. Counterpoint: Krav Maga teaches proportionality and de-escalation, with lethal techniques as a last resort. Critics may overlook its emphasis on context-appropriate responses. Context and Broader PerspectiveCultural Clash: Much of the criticism arises from philosophical differences. Traditional martial arts emphasize discipline, culture, or sport, while Krav Maga is utilitarian, designed for survival in chaotic, no-rules scenarios like those involving firearms or knives, as you specified. Training Variability: The quality of Krav Maga instruction varies widely, fueling criticism. A poorly taught class may reinforce skeptics’ views, while elite programs (e.g., military-based) counter these critiques. Cross-Training Solution: Many critics advocate combining Krav Maga with arts like Muay Thai (for striking) or BJJ (for grappling) to address its limitations, especially for quick fight resolution and weapon defense. ConclusionKrav Maga is criticized for its perceived simplicity, limited sparring, aggressive techniques, inconsistent training, overhyped marketing, weak ground game, and ethical concerns. These critiques often reflect differing goals—Krav Maga prioritizes rapid, practical defense and offense in life-threatening scenarios (e.g., against firearms/knives), while critics value technical depth, sport applicability, or restraint. Its effectiveness depends on the school, instructor, and training realism. 4) Introducing a concealed pistol carried by the practitioner significantly alters the analysis of martial arts effectiveness for defense and offense in a no-rules scenario, particularly when prioritizing quick fight resolution and addressing threats from firearms and knives. A concealed pistol shifts the dynamics of both defense (neutralizing threats while minimizing personal harm) and offense (rapidly incapacitating or eliminating an opponent), as it provides a lethal, ranged option that most martial arts don’t account for directly. Below, I reassess the effectiveness of Krav Maga (top for defense and offense), Muay Thai (offense), and other relevant systems, factoring in the practitioner’s concealed carry, while maintaining focus on permanently disabling or lethal techniques.Key ConsiderationsConcealed Pistol: A carried firearm changes the practitioner’s threat response. They must protect their weapon, draw efficiently under stress, and integrate it into their martial arts training. Firearm retention, situational awareness, and legal considerations become critical. Quick Fight Resolution: The pistol enables near-instantaneous incapacitation (lethal or disabling) at a distance, reducing reliance on hand-to-hand techniques unless the situation demands close-quarters combat (CQC). Firearms and Knives: The practitioner faces threats from armed attackers but now has a firearm to counter them, shifting the focus toward weapon retention, disarming opponents, and deciding when to escalate to lethal force. Training Integration: The martial art must complement firearms use, including drawing under pressure, defending the weapon, and transitioning between armed and unarmed techniques. Revised Analysis for DefenseKrav Maga (Still Top Choice)Why: Krav Maga remains the most effective for defense, as it explicitly trains for scenarios involving firearms, including defending against gun threats, disarming attackers, and integrating the practitioner’s own weapon. Carrying a concealed pistol aligns perfectly with Krav Maga’s philosophy of practical, no-rules self-defense. Defensive Strengths with a Pistol:Firearm Threats: Krav Maga teaches gun disarms (e.g., redirecting the barrel, controlling the wrist) at close range, allowing the practitioner to neutralize an attacker’s gun while protecting their own concealed weapon. Training includes stress drills to simulate drawing under threat. Knife Threats: Knife defenses (e.g., 360-degree blocks, arm traps) remain effective, with the pistol as a backup if the attacker closes distance before a draw is possible. For example, a practitioner could block a knife thrust, create space, and draw their firearm in 1–2 seconds. Weapon Retention: Krav Maga emphasizes protecting the practitioner’s firearm from being grabbed, using techniques like wrist locks or strikes to maintain control. Situational Awareness: Training enhances preemptive threat detection, allowing the practitioner to draw their pistol early (e.g., before a knife attacker closes distance), potentially avoiding physical engagement. Disabling/Lethal Potential: The pistol enables lethal force (e.g., center-mass shots) or disabling shots (e.g., to the legs) at a distance, far surpassing unarmed techniques in speed and effect. If disarming an attacker, the practitioner can use the opponent’s weapon or their own pistol to end the threat instantly. Change with Pistol: The concealed pistol amplifies Krav Maga’s defensive effectiveness by providing a ranged option, reducing reliance on hand-to-hand combat. It counters both firearms and knives faster than unarmed techniques, aligning with quick resolution. Kali/Eskrima (Improved Relevance)Why: Kali’s focus on edged weapons and disarming makes it highly effective for knife-heavy scenarios, and its weapon-based mindset integrates well with carrying a pistol. Defensive Strengths with a Pistol:Knife Threats: Kali’s knife defenses (e.g., deflections, limb destruction) allow the practitioner to neutralize a blade attack while creating space to draw their pistol. Firearm Threats: While less comprehensive than Krav Maga for gun disarms, Kali’s stick and knife training can adapt to redirecting a firearm’s muzzle, followed by a quick draw of the practitioner’s pistol. Weapon Versatility: Practitioners are trained to flow between weapons (e.g., knife, stick, firearm), making it easier to transition to their concealed pistol if unarmed defenses fail. Disabling/Lethal Potential: The pistol adds a lethal ranged option, complementing Kali’s slashing or stabbing techniques. A disarmed knife can be used to disable, while the pistol ensures rapid neutralization at distance. Change with Pistol: The pistol makes Kali more viable against firearms, where it was previously weaker, as the practitioner can draw their weapon after deflecting an attack, enhancing defensive speed. Caveat for Other Arts: Arts like Aikido or Judo, previously mentioned for defense, become less relevant. Their focus on controlling or throwing opponents doesn’t integrate well with firearms use, and they lack specific training for gun or knife disarms, making them slower for resolving armed threats.Revised Analysis for OffenseKrav Maga (Still Top Choice)Why: Krav Maga’s offensive capabilities are enhanced by a concealed pistol, as it trains practitioners to integrate firearms into CQC, ensuring rapid, lethal neutralization of armed threats. Offensive Strengths with a Pistol:Firearms: If the practitioner disarms an attacker’s gun, they can use it or their own pistol to deliver lethal shots (e.g., head or chest) in seconds. Training includes point shooting (firing without sights at close range) for speed. Knives: After disarming a knife, the practitioner can use it to slash vital areas (e.g., neck, femoral artery) or draw their pistol for a faster kill. Unarmed strikes (e.g., throat punches, eye gouges) remain lethal but are secondary to the firearm. Speed: A concealed pistol allows near-instant incapacitation (1–2 seconds to draw and fire), far faster than Muay Thai’s strikes or BJJ’s submissions, especially against armed opponents. Disabling/Lethal Potential: The pistol ensures lethal outcomes (e.g., multiple shots to vital areas) or permanent disability (e.g., knee shots to immobilize). Unarmed techniques like neck breaks or eye gouges are backups if the firearm is inaccessible. Change with Pistol: The pistol makes Krav Maga’s offense overwhelmingly effective, as it can resolve fights at a distance before physical engagement, aligning with quick resolution. It mitigates the need for prolonged striking or grappling. Muay Thai (Secondary, but Less Impactful)Why: Muay Thai’s devastating strikes (elbows, knees) remain potent, but its lack of firearms-specific training reduces its offensive edge when the practitioner carries a pistol. Offensive Strengths with a Pistol:Knives: Muay Thai’s clinch and strikes (e.g., elbows to the head) can disable a knife-wielding attacker, creating space to draw the pistol for a lethal shot. Firearms: Against a gun, Muay Thai offers no specific disarming techniques, but a preemptive strike (e.g., low kick to disrupt balance) could allow a quick draw. The pistol then becomes the primary offensive tool. Speed: Strikes like an elbow to the temple can knock out in 1–3 seconds, but drawing and firing a pistol (1–2 seconds) is faster and more lethal, especially at range. Disabling/Lethal Potential: The pistol overshadows Muay Thai’s strikes, as a single shot can kill or disable instantly compared to multiple strikes. Unarmed techniques remain useful in CQC but are secondary. Change with Pistol: The pistol reduces Muay Thai’s offensive relevance, as firearms dominate for quick resolution. Muay Thai’s value lies in scenarios where the pistol is inaccessible (e.g., jammed or grabbed). Combat Sambo (Gains Ground)Why: Combat Sambo’s integration of striking, grappling, and weapons (including firearms) makes it highly compatible with concealed carry, rivaling Krav Maga in armed contexts. Offensive Strengths with a Pistol:Firearms/Knives: Trains in both disarming and using weapons, allowing the practitioner to seize an opponent’s gun or knife and combine it with their own pistol for rapid kills. CQC Integration: Combines strikes (e.g., head kicks) and submissions (e.g., neck cranks) with firearm use, enabling seamless transitions (e.g., choke an opponent while drawing the pistol). Disabling/Lethal Potential: The pistol amplifies lethality, with shots to vital areas or disabling limb shots, supplemented by Sambo’s bone-breaking submissions or strikes. Change with Pistol: The pistol elevates Combat Sambo’s offensive potential, making it nearly as effective as Krav Maga, though its rarity and complex training make it less accessible. How the Pistol Changes the AnalysisDominance of Firearms: A concealed pistol shifts the priority from unarmed techniques to weapon retention, drawing, and firing under pressure. Krav Maga’s explicit training in these areas solidifies its position as the best for both defense and offense. Speed Advantage: A pistol resolves fights faster (1–2 seconds to draw and shoot) than even the quickest strikes (e.g., Muay Thai’s elbows) or submissions (e.g., BJJ’s chokes), aligning with your priority for quick resolution. Weapon Threats: Against firearms or knives, the practitioner’s pistol counters the attacker’s weapon directly, reducing reliance on disarms or evasion. Krav Maga and Combat Sambo integrate this better than Muay Thai or BJJ. Reduced Grappling Relevance: Arts like BJJ or Judo, which rely on ground fighting, become less practical, as staying on the ground risks losing the pistol or facing multiple attackers. Standing arts with weapon integration (Krav Maga, Kali) are favored. Legal/Ethical Risks: Using a pistol, even in self-defense, carries significant legal consequences, especially with lethal force. Krav Maga’s training emphasizes situational awareness to avoid escalation unless necessary. Addressing Krav Maga Criticisms with a PistolThe concealed pistol mitigates some criticisms of Krav Maga:Limited Ground Fighting: The pistol reduces the need for ground combat, as the practitioner can shoot from a standing position or after escaping a grapple. Overhyped Effectiveness: The pistol validates Krav Maga’s real-world focus, as its firearm training directly enhances the practitioner’s ability to use their weapon. Aggression Concerns: The pistol allows precise escalation, countering claims of excessive force, though legal risks remain. However, criticisms like inconsistent training quality or lack of sparring persist, emphasizing the need for a reputable instructor who incorporates firearms drills.ConclusionWith a concealed pistol, Krav Maga remains the most effective for both defense and offense due to its specific training in firearm retention, disarming, and integration against armed threats (guns, knives), ensuring quick fight resolution. The pistol amplifies its lethality and speed, making it ideal for neutralizing attackers at range or in CQC. Combat Sambo is a strong contender but less accessible, while Muay Thai and Kali are secondary, with the pistol overshadowing their unarmed techniques. Cross-training Krav Maga with firearms-specific courses (e.g., tactical shooting) would maximize effectiveness. OVERALL CONCLUSION The conversation evaluated the effectiveness of martial arts for defense and offense in a no-rules, real-world scenario, prioritizing quick fight resolution and addressing threats from firearms and knives, including permanently disabling or lethal techniques. Initially, Krav Maga was identified as the most effective for both defense and offense due to its practical focus on disarming and neutralizing armed attackers, with Muay Thai excelling in striking for offense and Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) offering strong grappling submissions. Criticisms of Krav Maga, such as its perceived simplicity, limited sparring, and aggressive techniques, were discussed, often stemming from differing martial arts philosophies. When factoring in the practitioner carrying a concealed pistol, Krav Maga’s effectiveness was further enhanced, as its firearm retention and disarming techniques integrate seamlessly with a pistol, ensuring rapid resolution against armed threats, while arts like Muay Thai and BJJ became less relevant due to their limited focus on firearms. #SelfDefense #MartialArts #Firearms #Knives #QuickResolution #LethalTechniques #StreetFight #FightingDirty #DirtyFighting #Survival #Preparedness #SituationalAwareness #DeEscalation #Escape #KravMaga #MuayThai #BJJ #Karate #Judo #Taekwondo #Boxing #MMA #KungFu #Aikido #Kickboxing #Sambo #WingChun #Capoeira #Silat #Kyokushin #Kali #Hapkido #Wushu #Savate

#GSD #Dash #NoExcuses #NoCrying #NoWhining

Android going towards no side loading. Locked down. Booo https://youtu.be/QBEKlIV_70E #LouisRossmann #Clippy #Protest #Ownership #RightToRepair #ConsumerRights #SideLoad #ThirdPartyApps #Ecosystem #Android #iOS

CLIENT SIDE SCANNING Mandated Government Spyware Encryption Bypass The EU is currently pushing the EU Chat Control legislation which has majority support. And the UK already passed the UK Online Safety Act last year. Though you think these are European initiatives, you will be surprised to know that all these actually impact us all, and they will impact us permanently. It will mean the absolute elimination of privacy and State control of all communications, if we do not speak out. Once again they invoke the "CSAM" banner to justify what is in fact the biggest overreach in the history of digital communications. https://youtu.be/KoqiNoHrvj0 #BigBrother #Censorship #Spyware #FirstAmendment #FreedomOfSpeech #Privacy #Surveillance #Encryption #E2EEncryption

55,000 students sing Holy is the Lamb in a stadium in Atlanta, Geogia. 55 Thousand students singing for Agnus Dei 20 minutes. I am always touched by this display of Love and Faith in our God. It always brings tear to my eyes. Maranatha ! Come Lord Jesus ! Come Quickly ! #AgnusDei #Passion #KristianStanfill #SpontaneousWorship #Christ #Jesus #Lamb #Holy #Worthy #Amen https://youtu.be/har4itYxlBg

Effects of Ketosis, Fasting, and Autophagy on the Body Ketosis, fasting, and autophagy are interconnected metabolic processes that can profoundly influence health, often overlapping in low-carb or fasting protocols. #### 1. **Effects of Ketosis on the Body** Ketosis is a metabolic state where the body shifts from using glucose (from carbs) as its primary fuel to burning fat for energy, producing ketones (like beta-hydroxybutyrate, or BHB) in the liver. This typically occurs when carb intake drops below 20–50 grams per day or during prolonged fasting. Ketosis is the foundation of ketogenic diets and can last as long as carbs remain low. **Positive Effects:** **Weight Loss and Fat Metabolism**: Initially, ketosis causes rapid weight loss due to a diuretic effect, depleting glycogen stores and releasing water (up to 5–10 pounds in the first week). Over time, it promotes fat loss by increasing lipolysis (fat breakdown) and using ketones for energy, which can improve body composition. Studies show this can lead to greater fat reduction compared to low-fat diets, especially in obese individuals. Ketones also suppress appetite via hormones like cholecystokinin (CCK), reducing overall calorie intake. **Brain and Cognitive Function**: Ketones provide an efficient fuel for the brain, potentially enhancing mental clarity, focus, and reducing "brain fog" once adapted. Research suggests ketosis may boost brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), supporting neuron growth and protecting against neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. **Muscle and Metabolic Health**: In active individuals, ketosis can preserve muscle mass by sparing protein breakdown. It improves insulin sensitivity, lowers blood sugar, and may benefit conditions like type 2 diabetes by reducing reliance on glucose. Additionally, it can enhance mitochondrial function, increasing energy efficiency at the cellular level. - **Other Benefits**: Potential anti-inflammatory effects, improved heart health markers (e.g., lower triglycerides), and better endurance in athletes due to fat adaptation. **Negative Effects and Risks:** - **Keto Adaptation Symptoms ("Keto Flu")**: Transitioning into ketosis often causes temporary side effects like headaches, fatigue, irritability, constipation, and sleep issues as the body adjusts from carb dependency. - **Other Concerns**: Extreme ketosis (ketoacidosis) is rare in healthy people but dangerous for diabetics. #### 2. **Effects of Fasting on the Body** Fasting involves abstaining from calories for periods ranging from 12–24 hours (intermittent fasting, like 16:8) to multi-day fasts. It triggers hormonal shifts, like lower insulin and higher growth hormone, promoting fat utilization and repair processes. **Positive Effects:** - **Weight Loss and Metabolic Regulation**: Fasting reduces calorie intake, leading to weight loss (primarily fat after initial water loss) and improved insulin sensitivity. It can lower blood sugar, HbA1c, and cholesterol levels, benefiting type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Research shows it enhances fat oxidation and preserves muscle through autophagy (more below). - **Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Benefits**: It may reduce blood pressure, triglycerides, and inflammation markers (e.g., CRP), lowering heart disease risk. Some studies link it to better gut health and microbiome diversity. - **Brain and Psychological Health**: Fasting boosts BDNF and neurogenesis, improving cognition, mood, and resilience to stress. It may protect against Alzheimer's and Parkinson's by clearing toxins. Psychologically, it can enhance mental clarity and self-discipline once hunger subsides. - **Cellular Repair and Longevity**: By inducing autophagy and stem cell regeneration, fasting promotes tissue repair, immune system reset, and potential anti-aging effects. Animal studies suggest it extends lifespan; human data shows reduced oxidative stress. - **Other Benefits**: Potential cancer prevention (by starving cancer cells of glucose), improved hormone balance, and better sleep patterns in some people. **Negative Effects and Risks:** - **Short-Term Side Effects**: Hunger, fatigue, irritability, headaches, and dizziness are common, especially initially. It can disrupt sleep or cause constipation from reduced fiber. - **Long-Term Concerns**: Excessive fasting may lead to muscle loss, nutrient deficiencies, weakened immunity, or hormonal imbalances (e.g., menstrual irregularities in women). In underweight individuals, it risks excessive weight loss affecting bones and energy. A recent MIT study found that while fasting aids intestinal stem cell regeneration, it may increase cancer risk in damaged tissues by promoting rapid cell growth post-fast. - **Contraindications**: Not suitable for pregnant women, children, or those with eating disorders, diabetes (without supervision), or certain medications. Fasting's benefits are most pronounced in short, cyclic patterns rather than prolonged deprivation. #### 3. **Effects of Autophagy on the Body** Autophagy ("self-eating") is a cellular recycling process where damaged organelles, proteins, and pathogens are engulfed in vesicles, broken down, and reused for energy or new components. It's upregulated during fasting, exercise, or stress, regulated by pathways like mTOR (inhibited by nutrient scarcity) and AMPK (activated by energy depletion). **Positive Effects and Health Benefits:** - **Cellular Cleanup and Repair**: Autophagy removes dysfunctional parts, preventing accumulation of cellular "junk" that causes aging and disease. It regenerates healthier cells, improving organ function (e.g., liver, brain). - **Disease Prevention**: It protects against neurodegeneration (e.g., Alzheimer's by clearing amyloid plaques), infections (by degrading pathogens), and metabolic disorders. In cancer, it can suppress tumor initiation by eliminating damaged DNA. It also reduces inflammation and oxidative stress, supporting heart health and longevity. - **Anti-Aging and Immunity**: By recycling components, it enhances mitochondrial health, boosts energy efficiency, and resets the immune system. Fasting-induced autophagy may improve vaccine responses and fight chronic inflammation. - **Other Benefits**: Supports weight loss by breaking down fat stores and may enhance exercise recovery. **Negative or Dual Effects:** - **Context-Dependent Risks**: While protective early on, excessive autophagy can lead to cell death (autophagic cell death) in stressed tissues. In cancer, it can promote tumor survival by helping cancer cells adapt to nutrient-poor environments or resist chemotherapy. - **Potential Drawbacks**: Impaired autophagy (e.g., from aging or genetics) contributes to diseases like Parkinson's, while overactivation might exacerbate conditions like heart failure. Autophagy peaks after 24–48 hours of fasting but can be induced mildly by ketosis or calorie restriction. _________________ 🚀 **Deep Dive: Ketosis, Fasting, & Autophagy – Unlocking Your Body's Power!** ☕🧠 Ever wondered how ketosis, fasting, and autophagy supercharge (or challenge) your health? From weight loss to cellular repair, these processes can transform your body. 🔍 **What is Ketosis & Its Body Effects?** Ketosis kicks in when carbs drop low (under 20–50g/day), forcing your body to burn fat for fuel and produce ketones. - **Pros**: Rapid weight loss (water then fat), appetite suppression, brain boost (ketones fuel neurons, reducing fog), better insulin sensitivity for diabetes management, and potential anti-inflammation. - **Cons**: "Keto flu" (headaches, fatigue) - **How Many Carbs Break It?** 50–100g net carbs/day often disrupts it, varying by activity and metabolism. Track with a ketone meter (aim for 0.5–3.0 mmol/L)! 🧹 **Autophagy: Your Body's Cellular Janitor** Autophagy recycles damaged cells during fasting or stress, promoting repair and longevity. - **Pros**: Clears toxins, fights aging, prevents diseases like cancer/Alzheimer's by removing faulty proteins, boosts immunity, and aids fat loss. - **Cons**: Overactivation can harm cells; in cancer, it might help tumors survive. - **Triggers & Breaking It**: Ramps up after 16–24h fasting. 20–50g carbs or 200–300 calories (esp. protein/carbs) suppress it via insulin/mTOR. Fats disrupt less! 🍽️ **Fasting's Full Impact on Health** Fasting (e.g., 16:8 or 24h) creates energy scarcity, triggering ketosis and autophagy. - **Pros**: Weight/fat loss, lower blood sugar/pressure, reduced inflammation, brain clarity, stem cell regen, and potential cancer prevention. - **Cons**: Hunger, fatigue, muscle loss if prolonged, or increased cancer risk in damaged tissues post-fast. - **Psychological Perks**: Enhanced focus and detox-like clarity as toxins clear. ☕ **Morning Habits: Coffee with Milk, Zero-Carb Drinks, or Bulletproof?** - **Whole Milk (1–2 tbsp)**: Adds 1–2g carbs/protein; fine for ketosis if low total carbs, but suppresses autophagy via insulin. - **Zero-Carb Energy Drinks**: Minimal impact (0 carbs), but watch sweeteners for subtle effects. - **Butter/MCT Oil (Bulletproof Coffee)**: 0 carbs, supports ketosis with fat fuel, less autophagy disruption than milk. Use 1 tsp each (~74 cal) for balance! 💡 **Pro Tips for Success**: - Start slow: Try 12–16h fasts to build tolerance. - Hydrate & electrolytes: Combat side effects. - Monitor: Use apps for carbs, ketone tests for ketosis. - Who Should Avoid? Pregnant, underweight, or those with medical conditions—consult a doc! What's your experience with keto or fasting? Share below! 👇 #HealthJourney --- **References**: Ketogenic Diet Overview - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499830/ Autophagy Benefits - https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/24058-autophagy Fasting Studies - https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/intermittent-fasting-what-is-it-and-how-does-it-work Bulletproof Coffee Guide - https://www.bulletproof.com/recipes/keto-recipes/best-keto-bulletproof-coffee-recipe #Ketosis #Autophagy #Fasting #KetoDiet #BulletproofCoffee #KetoCoffee #EnergyDrinks #CellularHealth #Cancer #Regenerate #Regeneration #IntermittentFasting #Health #Nutrition #Wellness #Metabolism #Grok #GrokConversations

nostr:nprofile1qqs2rlzal4lleatrezg4tdrxw5d4srg3tcfkutuvjr5fzvu9h0kmrncpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9mhwden5te0vaex7atswvhrq7rrdpshgtnrdaksru34wu talked about how men just want peace in the household. I can attest to this. It is one reason I hate those "Real Housewives" and "Reality" TV shows. All the fake arguing and pretending that this is how they actually live is not conducive to peace in the home. I don't want to listen to that crap. I don't get why my wife does. She always says she doesn't want to argue, but then turns on that tripe. Yeah, I want peace... #TSPC #TheSurvivalPodcast #Wife #Husband #Mate #Spouse #Marriage https://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/epi-3722

QUERY: Is there any talk of utilizing peer-to-peer cooperative computing as a base for an open-source LLM? GROK: Yes, there is growing discussion and research around utilizing peer-to-peer (P2P) cooperative computing as a foundation for open-source large language models (LLMs). This approach aims to decentralize the training, inference, and sharing of LLMs by leveraging distributed networks of user devices, similar to how P2P systems like Bitcoin or file-sharing networks operate. It addresses challenges like high computational costs, data privacy, centralization risks, and scalability in traditional LLM development. Below, I'll outline the key talks, projects, papers, and concepts emerging in this space, based on recent developments as of mid-2025. Key Concepts and Motivations P2P cooperative computing for LLMs typically involves: Federated Learning: Devices train models locally on their data and share only model updates (e.g., gradients) via P2P, preserving privacy without central servers. Decentralized Training and Inference: Splitting compute tasks across peers to reduce reliance on expensive GPU clusters, often incentivized by cryptocurrencies or tokens. Resource Sharing: Peers contribute idle CPU/GPU resources, enabling collaborative model building in a community-driven way. Open-Source Focus: Emphasizing fully reproducible models, including code, data pipelines, and weights, to foster innovation and avoid vendor lock-in. This is seen as a way to democratize AI, making advanced LLMs accessible without big tech dominance, while improving resilience, diversity in training data, and energy efficiency. However, challenges include high data transfer latency, ensuring model convergence, verifying contributions, and handling heterogeneous hardware (e.g., varying device capabilities). Notable Papers and Research Several academic and theoretical works explore P2P for open-source LLMs: GradientCoin (2023): A theoretical proposal for a fully decentralized LLM system inspired by Bitcoin. It envisions peers contributing compute power to train and maintain models, with a cryptocurrency rewarding participation. While purely conceptual, it highlights issues like backdoors in centralized models and the need for verifiable, open training. Federated LLMs in P2P Networks (2023): Proposes combining federated learning with P2P for training, using crypto incentives to encourage data and compute sharing. It emphasizes privacy (data stays local), scalability, and reduced environmental impact compared to centralized data centers. P2P Framework for Localized LLMs (2025): Describes a cost-effective P2P system for deploying quantized (compressed) open-source LLMs on edge devices. It supports adaptable applications and suggests future expansions like enhanced security. Asynchronous P2P Decentralized Federated Learning (2025): Introduces a blockchain-based framework for efficient, communication-light P2P training of LLMs, addressing synchronization issues in distributed setups. Survey on Decentralized LLM Training (2025): Categorizes efforts into community-driven (e.g., volunteer compute pools) and organizational (e.g., incentivized networks) approaches, noting P2P as a resource-efficient paradigm. LLM-Network (2025): A P2P sharing system for executing and scaling open-source LLMs, allowing peers to host and collaborate on models dynamically. These papers often reference open-source tools like federated learning libraries (e.g., Flower) and blockchain for coordination, with code repositories available for experimentation. Projects and Prototypes Practical implementations are emerging, often as open-source GitHub repos or frameworks: Parallax (Ongoing): A P2P inference protocol that splits LLMs across a distributed mesh of machines for execution. It enables "world-scale" inference without central servers, focusing on open-source models. OpenLedgerHQ: Coordinates P2P compute and data for running open-source LLMs locally on decentralized agents. Community nodes provide GPU/bandwidth, creating a trustless network rewarded via tokens. LMCache: An open-source LLM serving engine with P2P KV (key-value) cache sharing to speed up inference. It reuses computations across peers, reducing latency in long-context tasks. P2P AI Training Discussions (Reddit, 2023+): Community threads explore feasibility, citing federated learning and distributed gradient descent. Users note it's viable for smaller models but challenging for massive ones due to bandwidth limits. LLM Peer-to-Peer Evaluation (2023): A system where open-source LLMs evaluate each other in a P2P manner, combining votes for fair assessments—extending to collaborative training scenarios. Related efforts like llm-d (Kubernetes-based distributed inference) and collaborative models (e.g., PEER for editing) hint at hybrid P2P elements, though not purely cooperative. Community and Industry Buzz On platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit, conversations emphasize P2P's potential for "true" open-source LLMs, where everything (code, data, training) is reproducible and community-contributed. Incentives via crypto are a hot topic to motivate participation, echoing Bitcoin's model. Critics point out practical hurdles like slow syncing on consumer hardware, but optimism grows with advancements in edge computing and quantization. Outlook While still nascent—mostly theoretical or prototype-stage—P2P cooperative computing could transform open-source LLMs by enabling massive-scale collaboration without Big Tech infrastructure. Projects like those above are paving the way, and with tools like Ollama for local LLMs, we're seeing momentum toward hybrid local-P2P setups. This area is evolving quickly, driven by the push for decentralized AI. ______________ QUERY: What is on the horizon for LLM's? Will there be locally hosted models on our phones that are only controlled by the end user with no reporting back to a central database? Or will they become just another tool of the elite to control the masses? GROK: Future Trends in Large Language Models (LLMs) The landscape for LLMs is evolving rapidly as of mid-2025, driven by advancements in efficiency, accessibility, and integration into everyday tools. Key trends include a push toward more affordable and efficient models, with a focus on smaller, specialized LLMs that reduce inference costs while maintaining high performance. This is partly achieved through techniques like synthetic training data generation, real-time fact-checking integration, and "sparse expertise" where models excel in niche domains without needing vast general knowledge. Multimodal capabilities—handling text, images, audio, and more—are also on the rise, enabling more versatile applications like personalized content creation and hybrid systems that blend different data types. Agentic AI, where models act autonomously across systems, is gaining traction in enterprises, shifting from basic generative tools to decision-making workflows. Overall, the market is projected to grow significantly, with North America's LLM sector alone potentially reaching $105.5 billion by 2030, fueled by domain-specific tools and broader adoption. Locally Hosted Models on Phones: A Growing Reality Yes, locally hosted LLMs on smartphones and other devices are already emerging and are poised to become more common, emphasizing user control, privacy, and no mandatory reporting to central servers. This shift to "on-device" or "edge" computing processes data locally, reducing latency, enabling offline use, and keeping sensitive information on the user's hardware rather than transmitting it to the cloud. For instance, Apple has rolled out on-device LLMs that run entirely locally without cloud reliance, marking a momentum toward privacy-focused AI. Android users can now run models via tools like llama-server or apps such as ChatterUI, allowing free, local inference on phones. Frameworks like Google's LLM Inference API and MLC enable developers to deploy compressed models optimized for mobile hardware, addressing resource constraints. By 2027 and beyond, experts anticipate further optimization for edge devices, with models shrinking to fit low-compute environments like phones, cars, or appliances—trading some accuracy for speed and security in sensitive sectors like healthcare. This decentralization empowers users by placing AI "in your hands," minimizing data exposure and potentially earning rewards through personalized interactions. While smaller local models (SLMs) may lag in generalization compared to cloud-based giants, hybrid approaches—using local SLMs for routine tasks and querying larger LLMs only when needed—are bridging the gap. Operating systems like iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows are integrating these capabilities natively, turning everyday devices into AI powerhouses without standalone hardware. Challenges remain: local models can slow devices or limit features due to hardware constraints, but advancements in compression and efficiency are mitigating this. Overall, this trend democratizes AI, making it more accessible and user-controlled. The Risk of LLMs as Tools for Elite Control On the flip side, there's valid concern that LLMs could reinforce centralized power structures, potentially serving as tools for elites to influence or control information flows. Centralized AI systems, dominated by a few large organizations, enable unified governance and economies of scale but raise issues like data monopolies, biases, and ethical lapses in privacy or misinformation. For example, centralized models often dictate fine-tuning and ethics policies internally, which could skew outputs or limit access. Regulatory uncertainties, such as in a potential second Trump term, might favor decentralized innovation but risk lax federal oversight on safety and equity. However, decentralization—via blockchain, community-driven training, or distributed governance—offers a counterbalance, promoting transparency, reducing biases, and enhancing cybersecurity. Studies highlight trade-offs: centralized setups provide control and compliance, while decentralized ones foster autonomy, resilience, and ethical data use. In private equity and beyond, hybrid models blending both are emerging to balance innovation with oversight. A Balanced Outlook The future of LLMs isn't binary—local, user-controlled models are advancing quickly for privacy and accessibility, while centralized systems persist for complex tasks. Trends lean toward decentralization to address ethical concerns, but vigilance is needed to prevent misuse. Ultimately, open-source growth, regulatory evolution, and user demand will shape whether LLMs empower individuals or consolidate power. As an AI myself, I see value in tools that maximize truth-seeking and user agency, like those enabling local runs without external tracking. #LLM #AI #P2P #Decentralized #OpenSource #Privacy #EdgeComputing #FederatedLearning #OnDevice #Blockchain #Democratization #Centralization #Ethics #Inference #Training #MobileAI #Distributed #Cooperative #Scalability #CryptoIncentives

Oppenheimer's biological counterpart? https://youtu.be/TU3HUqUZeYw Chiral life, often referred to as "mirror life" or "mirror-image life," is a hypothetical or synthetic form of life composed of biomolecules that are mirror reflections of those found in natural organisms. All known life on Earth is homochiral, meaning it predominantly uses left-handed amino acids for proteins and right-handed sugars for DNA and RNA, creating a consistent "handedness" in molecular structures that cannot be superimposed on their opposites, much like left and right hands. This chirality is fundamental to biological processes, as mirror-image molecules would not interact properly with natural enzymes, receptors, or immune systems. Researchers in synthetic biology are exploring the creation of chiral life, such as mirror bacteria or cross-chiral systems (e.g., RNA that amplifies across chiralities), to potentially advance drug development, understand the origins of life's handedness, or engineer novel therapeutics. Research into chiral life has raised significant concerns among scientists, leading to calls for pauses, global discussions, or outright halts on certain experiments due to potential biosafety and biosecurity risks. Key perceived dangers include: Evasion of immune defenses and untreatable infections: Mirror organisms could be invisible to the chiral-specific immune mechanisms in humans, animals, and plants, potentially causing lethal diseases that antibiotics, vaccines, or natural defenses cannot combat, as these tools target natural-handed molecules. Irreversible ecosystem disruption: Without natural predators, parasites, or competitors that recognize their chirality, mirror life forms might proliferate uncontrollably if released into the environment, outcompeting or ravaging existing life and leading to widespread ecological collapse. Biosecurity threats and accidental release: Even in controlled labs, escapes could occur, and mirror bacteria might be weaponized or evolve unpredictably, posing "unprecedented" risks to global health and agriculture with no proven containment methods. These risks stem from the fundamental incompatibility between mirror and natural life, which, while offering scientific benefits, could create organisms that are effectively invincible in our biosphere. #ChiralLife #MirrorLife #SyntheticBiology #Homochirality #MirrorMolecules #ChiralResearch #BiosafetyRisks #BiosecurityThreats #EcosystemImpact #SyntheticLife #ChiralityScience #MirrorBacteria #BioengineeringEthics #ChiralTherapeutics #ExistentialThreat #ExtinctionLevelEvent #Pandemic #Plague

What are the best NOSTR clients available right now? What features are appealing about your choices? Amethyst is not working right now and I want a back up to Primal... #growNOSTR #Amethyst #Primal #Iris #Alby

(A recent post I made for other platforms.) We have all seen it: -->Fake News ---->Biased News ------>Misinformation -------->Disinformation ---------->Fabrications ------------>Propaganda Those in power want to decide what we see and hear and what we know. How can we hold the government or each other accountable if we do not know the truth? How can we make intelligent decisions without all the facts? Who should choose what you are allowed to say? Who decides what you can hear? All of the questions are important and can be broken down into one word: CENSORSHIP. The Mainstream Media (MSM) companies have all been captured by special interests. The golden age of unbiased reporting of just the facts is long gone and in it's place is a propaganda machine that seeks to control what you know and what you believe. Those in power do not believe that we should be allowed to make up our own minds about important things that happen in the world. They dumb down the news and put their biased spin on it's delivery while leaving out details that don't support their narrative. And here is the kicker, WE LET THEM. The majority of people don't really care what happens or why as long as their boat doesn't rock too much. They like the predictable even if it trends in the wrong direction because it feels safer. “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -Samuel Adams I don't feel this way and I have no respect for those who do. We fought for what we have and if we do not fight to keep it, we will lose it. What can we do about it? There are many things we can do. There are many technologies we can employ. Make no mistake though, it will be a fight. Censorship is only partially possible. There are always ways around it. Privately developed open source peer-to-peer distributed communication networks are one way to fight back NOSTR (Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted over Relays) is a good example of this concept. -->NOSTR is a protocol like http (the internet). There are many clients (programs that run on the protocol. Think Internet Explorer, Safari, Chrome, & Firefox) already available with more on the way. Most of the programs are open source and therefore easily auditable. Right now it's biggest use case is as a replacement for Twitter/X but there will be many more uses as the client base matures. It inherently has no corporate algorithms to drive engagement, no shadow-banning, no thought police, or censorship of any kind. Individual clients may institute some of these "Features" but those that the public does not like will die off naturally. The competition of the free market will ensure that new innovations will constantly be emerging. -->The content on NOSTR is distributed redundantly across many nodes in the network ensuring that it survives the takedown attempts of any governments or other powerful organizations. Unless the internet itself goes down, you will still have access to everything that anyone posts. -->Every post is cryptographically signed to verify the identity of the originator. This is important because your reputation and body of work will not be subject to takedown orders. It also means that whatever you post is out there for all time, so think hard before posting something that could get you in trouble. If an investigator has the time and resources, then they can probably track down the origin of any particular post. There are ways around this but they would only work if there is zero connection to you, your email, your ISP, your physical location, your router, or any of your electronics or their locations. In this day of ubiquitous GPS, cell connection, wi-fi scanning, and facial recognition that is harder than you might think. But that is a different subject for a different post. We are talking about censorship here, not privacy. -->On the subject of tracking what you look at, they can't. They can't stop you from seeing it, and they don't know what you have seen. Because of the open source nature of most of the clients, software designers, hackers, and anyone else who has the knowledge can look at the source code of the programs to verify that there is no spyware or other malware present. This is huge. It means that any attempt to spy on you using these programs will be quickly discovered and fixed or warned against. This will make censoring your speech and your receiving of speech much harder. -->If you discover that a NOSTR client has been compromised you can always switch to another and take your identity with you. In the same way that you can recover your bitcoin from a seed phrase, you can also recover your NOSTR identity. -->There is no requirement to verify your identity with government ID. No Know-Your-Customer requirements. No Rules about hate speech, nationalism, religion, opinion, or immigration status. This is unregulated by design. It can not be done. -->All of these things make NOSTR a good information retrieval & dissemination platform. How are tyrannical governments going to stop you from receiving and relaying information that they don't like? Britain? France? EU? Are you all listening? -->Learn more about NOSTR at https://nostr.com/ NOSTR is Big Brother's worst nightmare. The State can not control it. The State can not silence it. The State can not stop it. The State Hates It. That is why I like it... #Censorship #NOSTR #Decentralized #FreeSpeech #OpenSource #Cryptography #PeerToPeer #Privacy #BigBrother #Freedom #MSM #Bias #Propaganda #FakeNews #Disinformation