Every single piece of personal data you put online will be leaked. Lie accordingly.
franzap
fran@zapstore.dev
npub1wf4p...dgh9
Building nostr:npub10r8xl2njyepcw2zwv3a6dyufj4e4ajx86hz6v4ehu4gnpupxxp7stjt2p8 | BA π¦π·

If you wanted to control bitcoin you would add regulations, surveillance, bad press, CBDCs, Saylors, ETFs, or try a hard fork.
But you would never think of infiltrating Core.
Interfacing with AI linearly through a chat is suboptimal for many tasks. At some point we will look back and ask ourselves how we worked like this.
Moreover, the default chat experience is bad in itself:
- Answers as walls of text, so you have to hunt for the useful or actionable bits
- Language that feels foreign and most (normal) work colleagues would ever use
When you aggregate hundreds of these interactions daily (not to mention context switching - another topic) it becomes exhausting.
I am no UX designer but experimenting with a non-linear, interactive mode for working on documents, as well as a "slop condom" skill that takes the best of: caveman, fuck slop, the ADHD one, and simplified technical English.
Both can work independent of each other but put together looks promising.
What kind of psychiatric disorder to you need to have to put a monkey jpeg in the blockchain?
Flipping coins > rolling dice
BIP-110 appears to potentially cause issues while not actually fixing the spam problem, but I don't know enough.
What I do know is there are many shady characters behind anti-BIP-110, and that raises suspicion.
