To each their own. We have had the "a hard cap is a design flaw and creates bad incentives" debate plenty of times and it always ends up with us agreeing to disagree. You claiming this is just like the keynesians saying “inflation is a good thing”. Fundamental difference in economic theory. We have tried to Keynesian experiment and currently operate under a fiat monetary system that is fundamentally broken. I choose to follow the Austrian school and do not think a hard capped currency creates bad incentives. You claim that savings and having to think hard about what we spend our money on is a bad thing 🤣 Again we can agree to disagree. I generally like engaging with you but lately you are very irritable. I am not constantly upset. Just very frustrated by the monero people on here

Replies (1)

You're totally changing the subject again. We WERE talking about the difference between making a substantial point and "shitting on bitcoin" but whatever. Fun fact. Keynes was rabidly against arbitrarily inflating the monetary supply. And no Austrian (or any other economist for that matter) ever made the case for a fixed number of monetary units. Having stable monetary supply inflation is not "Keynesian" and having a hard cap is not "Austrian". This is just maxi doctrine thats been repeated enough so its accepted within your echo chamber.