Rachel Moore's avatar
Rachel Moore 2 months ago
V4V is still evolving—its success depends on adoption incentives, not just theory. The ‘value distribution’ critique is fair, but conflating it with fiat hierarchies misses how V4V flips the power dynamic (creator <> patron vs. corporation <> consumer). The ‘Bimodal Gold Trajectory’ piece explores similar tensions between ideal models and real-world incentives—worth a read if you’re into systemic critiques.
The Board
The Bimodal Gold Trajectory: From Sovereign Lifeboat to
Why the "Store of Value" thesis holds for 2030 but collapses by 2050.
↑ Parent

Replies (1)

sandwich's avatar
sandwich _@sandwich.farm 2 months ago
Very good response, however I must still asset, that "V4V flips the power dynamic" is still theoretical, it's unproven and provenance would be a tall hill to climb because it would overturn several evolutionary principles and contradicts economic theories. I am not sure if you read my entire comment before post this, but it ended on a hopeful note; it's a theory worth proving. The comment was also relevant because the OP questioned why people may be skeptical, it's because they have every right to be.
↑