The first that should be mentioned is the fact that there have been no real successful implementations of a DAO with any real economic value, by which I mean an actually, functionally autonomous (that's the "A") corporation or entity living on the Blockchain. The titular "DAO" that failed back in the 2010's and caused the split between Eth and Eth classic was a sort of attempt at this... but the problem goes deeper....

The real issue is the fundamental ways in which ownership is constructed in modern society. The "Eth bros", the entire VC world, essentially relies on the State to validate ownership. Thus there is a fundamental conflict between an entity or corporation that "owns itself" on the Blockchain and an actual (real-world) company that could have shareholders, investors, owners, & etc in the meat-world. So this is a situation where one system must dominate; either the Fiat or the Blockchain. Your traditional wealth, your Big houses, your Lambos, all require Fiat to ultimately be the "value base layer."

You need to study Kaspa then. It’s a fair-launched, POW, with smart contracts pending with a current BPS of 10. You won’t like ETH after you see or.