Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

Relays: 5

Replies: 2

Generated: 04:16:25

Nyoro~n Nyoro~n@static.bitdevs.tw npub1zwyr...qlfd

so users should just stomach the datacarrier code comment changes in exchange for security patches? what if users simply dont want to relay garbage (inscriptions, stamps, large op_returns, etc) as unconfirmed transactions to their peers? shit out of luck?

2025-10-13 01:10:19 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓

Replies (2)

roll_the_dice npub1jyhx...asr4

What are the datacarrier changes in v29?

2025-10-13 01:42:53 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply

Nyoro~n Nyoro~n@static.bitdevs.tw npub1zwyr...qlfd

im referring to the code comment change to datacarrier in v26 which limits datacarrier to outputs (meaning input-styled arbitrary data storage schemes like inscriptions would not be in scope) on another note, v29.1 has the minrelay fee changes (reduced from 1 to .1) backported

2025-10-13 02:16:13 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply