regarding satoshi’s coins, i don’t think i would be able to support making anyone’s coins unspendable. regardless of the reason, it sets a precedent that breaks my fundamental view of why i hold bitcoin… who will decide in the future what is a valid reason to make coins unspendable

Replies (1)

In principle I agree but if it came out that their was a malicious stake attack, I'd pray there'd be economic support for a multi-chain path that included at least one with unspendable coins for the malicious attacker. That'd would at least give a chain where the malicious stake would have a hard time influencing price in a negative way. While I might not support it by buying additional stake on that chain I'd likely hodl on that chain to reduce the malicious actors ability to influence it.