You lack the common sense and the touch of reality when start inventing your own clown rules and theories to try to defend your position. Its not a repetiotion of a dogma, its a repetiotion of the established definition of fungible money. You can live in your own invented reality, no one cares about that.

Replies (2)

pretending like you've actually made a consistent argument lol instead of leaning on an AI that actually told you "fungible money has to have indistinguishable units" so you pretend utxos are equivalent to cash, which I refuted. then just repeating "you're wrong." now you "repeated the established definition of fungible money" somewhere. which you didn't.