There probably won’t be a re-org either because BIP110 never gets a majority of hash power, or because a re-org is simply prevented with a URSF/checkpoint/whatever. (Or both.)
Login to reply
Replies (3)
hm, it'll be interesting to watch for sure.
Haven't seen a URSF client yet so this is all posturing it seems. We will see if miners are willing to risk wipeout but I think it could only take a couple to cave and the dominos will fall
Little incentive to invest time and effort in creating a URSF client when there’s ~no support for a UASF in the first place.
Post-fork, in the unlikely scenario that a re-org becomes even a even slightly feasible risk, a simple checkpoint suffices.