Do you think bitcoin should be used for monetary transactions?
Use bitcoin for monetary transactions, then.
Login to reply
Replies (27)
These are the projects pushing this vision forward.
Not these "anti-spam" LARPers.
nostr:nevent1qqsgl5ewfpy5k407dcsdtfygpq4q5gsf3sga5xjspuc9h0pnxqss0sqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3qqny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysxpqqqqqqzhc3meu
There is a group who believe bitcoin should be used for capital leverage.
That group is boring and should have stayed in TradFi. π
Letβs not make it harder to run nodes. Letβs make it easier for low bandwidth, low income people to run nodes. v30 does the opposite.
Nonsense.
correct, if anything it makes it easier to run nodes, assuming they are correct that op_return spam will increase. This will lead to smaller blocks.
Amen.
Yep. Thatβs the great part about tools, you can use them for whatever the hell you want to use them for.
What's nonsense? I feel like missed something. Granted have been working a lot.
You're selling something for Bitcoin?
No, I use Monero for that.
Bitcoin is better suited for balance sheets, SBR and cold store of value storage.
Yes, my labour.
I've been getting paid almost exclusively in bitcoin for about a decade now.
The Genesis Book is also for sale in bitcoin: https://store.bitcoinmagazine.com/products/the-genesis-book?srsltid=AfmBOopMQMCWMFx99bhUwvY6c_Hn-0FKbx7Lb8gISEJzuhJpjklvri_R
yes, itβs easy like that
#YESTR
nostr:nevent1qqsq5mdmhyklfs7hjwr33wtxde355q2eegfs7njf9f59p7lpgfm4nccpndmhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0y5erqamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep0y5erqffjxpshvct5v9ez2v3swaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5hj2v3sy5erqctkv96xzu39xgc8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6te9xgc8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7ffjxpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9u07kdec
The only weakness of Bitcoin is that only a tiny number of those who hold it use btc for monetary transactions. In my experience, almost all businesses, while aware of it, do not accept payments with it, and those who hold it prefer to pay in fiat.
Bitcoin is money but somehow some people think it ought to host jpegs and other random shit.
We use it for monetary transactions only.
That is why we run Bitcoin Knots and support the soft fork.
But you and your spam supporter friends who gravitate around shitcoinmagazine seem to really like spam on Bitcoin and the compromised Core v30.
... together with the shitcoiners.
nostr:nevent1qqsf8djkj2nrdjk34fmmvyg0wh0mhezv003xqdj7jz2s9w400zn5d9cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tca9kgdx
... together with the shitcoiners.
nostr:nevent1qqsf8djkj2nrdjk34fmmvyg0wh0mhezv003xqdj7jz2s9w400zn5d9cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tca9kgdx
I am using BTC by hodling it. I don't want to buy things right now, I want to save purchasing power. That's a core monetary use.
I definitely don't want shitcoinery and stupid meme jpgs.
Priced in fiat lol. #btcfail
Yes, but not directly. I think the Future is It backing various kinds of Bitcoin-backed currencies, like eCash. Those currencies convertable to Bitcoin.
I wanted to buy your book with LN btc, but it is not obvious how to pay with btc. Seems that we website pushes for mainstream payments. Do I have to search better?
Everyone is different. Thats a good thing :)
Absolutely! I actually used Bitcoin to book a fishing yacht here in Dubai last month. We sailed out near the Palm, caught some kingfish, and paid in BTC , super smooth. If youβre into combining adventure with crypto, check out this fishing yacht cruise in Dubai:
https://www.yachtdxb.com/yacht-packages/fishing-yacht-charter-dubai-cruise-catch/
No cash, no hassle β just sea and Satoshis π
Yeah I agree. Part of me just want to accumulate more sats π But I found myself thoroughly enjoying asking vendors if they accept BTC and then paying those that do
How will it lead to smaller blocks?
you probably didn't try to buy β it is pretty obvious how to pay with ln btc
op_returns donβt get the witness discount. If people started spamming them the total size of the block would be smaller (up to 1mb) compared to a potential of 4mb for txs that get the witness discount (inscriptions, segwit txs, etc). The utxo set would be smaller as well since op_returns are provably unspendable so they can be removed. All of these things make it easier to run a node: slower growth of disk space requirements, quicker validation.
Not saying that blocks full of these would be a good thing, just saying they wouldnβt make running a node harder, it would make it easier.
So we need to fix segwit too! :)