No. Setting my own mempool policy is not censorship at all.
Don't know about you, but I have the freedom of speech. I'm allowed to say whatever I want. Censorship is preventing people from speaking.
Isn't it more like tyranny when the dominant implementation makes changes that will force you to do something against your will. In fact this is the type of thing bitcoiners should be fighting against. A single organization dictating what my mempool should look like.
Absolutely insane.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Did you read my post? You're free to do what you want, you don't get to make CORE write the code to do it.
You do realize that's exactly what we have now:
"A single organization dictating what my mempool should look like."
If we stop filtering by DEFAULT (PLEASE READ THIS WORD) and let everyone do what they want, then no one person or implementation of filters or set of nodes is going to dictate anything, where our current implementation of DEFAULTS (THIS IS THE IMPORTANT WORD IN THIS SENTENCE) is precisely a single dominant organization setting up the policy that blocks some transactions from propogating without back channels. These transactions are financially viable. People demand them, god help them.