I was a bit hesitant on this matter. Simply because I firmly believe that whistleblowing comes with risks and responsibilities. To release a document without first reading and redacting where appropriate is not ideal. It increases risk for all involved. However, in your exchange with the requester, his veiled threats became quite obvious «It's not a threat. It's a letter of good faith legally required before taking further actions ». Censorship resistance is why I am here. Without truly decentralized and free communication the « revolution » is doomed. The absurdity of it is this… I would have not known about the allegations made against the requester had he not requested to censor content on a censorship resistant protocol.