i'm not disagreeing on the fundamentals, but sending any event to anyone that asks doesn't break interop, just like retaining events when the spec says they should be dropped. if you rely on this behavior, someone will get burned
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Yea, sure that's the same critique I had for nip-70 (protected events) since the beginning, but from my perspective, the key here is that if an implementation doesn't follow the spec is a bad implementation, and then we can discuss about sibyl attacks, but that's a different conversation.