It isn't just my "desktop toy." It it's about changing the culture until everyone is running them to secure the network and not just for an immediate profit motive, the same way everyone should run a node. That will drive down profits and force some of those bigger players to shut down too. Bigger hodlers should hash more, I just used the bitaxe as an entry level example. If you have 1 bitcoin I think you should at least run a node and 1 bitaxe, minimum. How much per month should you be willing to spend to secure a larger stack? It scales up from there. If you have 100 coins I think a much larger hashrate is appropriate. Any losses should be thought of as the recurring security cost of keeping your life savings secure. That other security first coin some people like to bring up is hopelessly unprofitable to mine at any electric cost and any CPU efficiency. That is because everyone mines as a matter of course. Bitcoiners could take a lesson. Mining isn't a thing you do for a profit motive. It is more of a civic duty, like picking up trash in the local park.

Replies (1)

Were the PR campaign for more distributed civic mining instead of always for a profit motive, you and me and anyone else we can convince of the importance. I'm pointing it out to you. I've posted on nostr about it before even doing the math for how much hash you need for your % of hash to equal your % of all coins held. I brought it up at the last in person meetup I went to. The commercial miners won't ever stand up to the gov when the rubber hits the road, they are infrastructure dependant. It has to be distributed at the device level so the government simply has too many targets to effectively engage with forcing compliance. Then the individuals can change pools at will or even solo from their own infrastructure like some of the people in meshtadel are working on.