Yeah all included (taxes, utilities, everything). I would get half the square footage and live in a much more sketchy area if I had to rent right now. Again, yeah it would be nice if we could have put it all in bitcoin, but we need to live somewhere and it happens to be cheaper for us to own where we are and when we got in.

In eight years, I suspect you're net worth would be more if you rent than buy. I compared my parent"s house in southern California to gold in 1989(the year they bought) Gold would have done better, so renting + stacking the difference is a better bet if your net worth is your only value. If you live in a van and stack sats, your net worth will be even higher. If you live in a tent and stack sats, you'll be super rich. If you live under a bridge and stack sats, you will become as rich as you can possibly be. Money isn't the only value though. Maybe living under a bridge means you're worth 100 million in 8 years, but owning a house means your worth 50 million. I would choose the house, because of the marginal theory of return, but value is subjective. If I was single, I would live in a van.