This is part of the idea. This opinion is really interesting though in how it distinguishes open from concealed carry from a historical perspective to reach its conclusion. It's a very well written opinion and worth reading if you're up for it.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I’ll read it when I get a few moments, but seeing your other post where you quote the historical perspective (being concealed carry was not protected under the constitution if I read it right) doesn’t that weaken the argument for concealed carry as a part of the 2A? I know I need to read the opinion before forming one of my own, but the 2A should be to any possession, concealed or not, regardless of others’ opinion of the visibility.
Anyway, this is the last ill post here until I read it.