Lindblad? That's your card? Maube for NISQ machine w/out error correction, from back in the good old days. What Atom is doing (again one of 60 or so paths being explored) keeps things way far from Rydberg state. LIke the entire purpose of QEC is to overcome the physical limits of T2 (coherence time). When you constantly measure and correct in a small group of physical qubits, the lifetime of the logical qubit gets exponentially extended, making the Lindblad N2 decay irrelevant for the computational unit.
I get the feeling this path you're on is all stuff coming out of the NISQ archives or something.
I mean the fact that atom is *already* using 1,200+ physical qubits to build 28 logical qubits with a better-than-physical error rate is empirical proof that that your Lindblad limit is obsolete in a computation context
Login to reply
Replies (1)
You just made a very substantial false statement.
Lindblad is the gold-standard description of open quantum systems.
It has never been falsified.
Every attempt to scale past a few hundred physical qubits confirms it: N² correlated decoherence wins.
QEC doesn’t repeal Lindblad.
It adds more measurements and makes the N² term worse.
Show me one paper where Lindblad is falsified or QEC removes the N² scaling.
Either show me a paper that disproves Lindbald or admit you are wrong.
No more dodging.