Have a listen to the episode and see what you think I’d be interested in your opinion My feeling is that a lot of “peer review” is actually totally biased, and in this case proof is arising that virology itself is built on a lie, which is a huge deal The guest is a emergency room Dr with many years of experience studying peer reviewed literature

Replies (2)

No, not going to listen to an hour long podcast. If there's an argument it should be succinctly explained in a paragraph at the most. This is called the "abstract" of a scientific paper. It explains the basic argument and the support for it... and if you want to be taken seriously with something as sweeping as "virology is a lie," there should be a good reason for it. Like, what does that even mean? That DNA is a lie? That viral RNA can't be injected into cells which in turn will replicate copies of the virus? It's all just crystals and Spirit Woo all the way down?
South Carolina would like a word. Measles outbreak said what? It’s definitely political in the #USA & we have our issues but denial of science 🧬 is the very reason people don’t believe in #climate #change etc. #RIP #Rachel #Carson Where did all the butterflies 🦋 go? Too easy of an answer for most people. Earth is already dead 💀 Most just don’t care. Thanks Al Gore. Why? Cause 99% bleed for nefarious 1% greed. They keep us divided. #Thanks Looks around … image