How is pen and paper doing any good without something doing actual readings? How are when you think about it readings going to be as accurate as continuous ones? Who says the EMF is doing any harm whatsoever and with what proof?
Login to reply
Replies (1)
In regards to your first couple questions - You don’t always need continuous data to understand your own biology.
Pen + paper works because you’re tracking the inputs that actually move the needle—sleep, sunlight, nutrition, movement, mood, stress, etc. Those patterns tell you far more than a device buzzing on your wrist.
In regards to the EMF question - When Robert O. Becker went on 60 Minutes in 1977 warning that non-native EMFs might have biological effects, his Navy-funded lab was quietly defunded. The research wasn’t disproven — it was never allowed to continue.
So when people say “there’s no evidence EMFs cause harm,” notice how convenient that half-truth is for industries built on nonstop wireless tech. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Billions have flowed into expanding Big Tech and Big Electric — not into studying long-term biological safety. No shocker there.
And honestly… we’re all on Nostr for a reason, right?