This is very true and why the Nostr approach of having multiple servers (and clients talking to many of them simultaneously), each with their own rules and moderation policy, is the only way forward. See also: View quoted note → Bluesky and friends are pushing for a network with a single point-of-failure with regards to moderation, and, as Masnick used to know, that cannot end well.
rabble's avatar rabble
Content Moderation Is Impossible At Scale - The @npub1f4fa...f7ql Impossibility Theorem of Content Moderation I think a bunch of folks here might not know about this internet 'law' but it does feel like Nostr folks might agree with this. https://www.techdirt.com/2019/11/20/masnicks-impossibility-theorem-content-moderation-scale-is-impossible-to-do-well/
View quoted note →

Replies (3)

I'm pretty sure they ban you from the AppView, not only from the PDS. It would make no sense otherwise and they have said so. No one is guaranteed any right to stay in their AppView, as evidenced by the amount of checks and limits they put on the front door. The reasons for each specific ban do not matter. As long as you find a centralized point there will be always many "reasons": app stores, governments, advertisers, blackmailers, personal quibbles from moderators, whatever. Labelers can work well for small things, I agree, but I think the Bluesky designers misjudged their efficacy against the big things.
If you want good content moderation study how Reddit did it, the most advanced algorithms for moderation so far, with several pillars.